So perfectly simple. Since there’s nothing to see, why hide tens of thousands of JFK documents for over half a century.
You can’t have it both ways.
“Since there’s nothing to see, why hide tens of thousands of JFK documents for over half a century”
What I think the feds are hiding is that the FBI, Famous But Incompetent, blew it. The CIA was watching Oswald at the Soviet embassy in Mexico when Oswald went there to claim he would kill JFK for the cause of communism. The Soviets had no use for Oswald and rebuffed him. The CIA told the FBI, but they did not effectively handle the information, such as letting the Secret Service know and covering Oswald while JFK was in Dallas. The FBI looks incompetent and tried to hide any and all documents showing they knew but did little.
What do you mean by nothing to see? That Oswald was part of a US government conspiracy? Or that the could have watched him more carefully and stopped him if they had?
Do you think if there were a conspiracy to kill the President Of The United States there’s going to be a paper trail!?! Are you for real?
Here is the long-and-short of this whole deal in my own opinion:
Maybe there were some legitimate reasons for withholding large amounts of evidence in the years near the assassination - particularly in light of sensitivity for the family.
But here we are 50+ years later and the real meat and details are still being held tightly by the Three-letter agencies. What could possibly still be of relevance to national security that would justify the withholding of ANY of the files on the JFK assassination? WHY the ongoing secrecy?
ANSWER: There is still something MASSIVE and revealing about the abject corruption and scary power held by some over and in our nation.
Exactly. I can’t believe there is nothing damaging to some people in the documents based on the number of shills I have seen over the years bashing and trying to insult people into silence that don’t believe the government version as it was dished up.