Skip to comments.Lee Harvey Oswald Was CIA [hoax]
Posted on 10/28/2017 10:22:50 PM PDT by Enlightened1
"Oswald subject was trained, under cover of the office of Naval Intelligence, for Soviet assignments."
#JFKFiles transforms another conspiracy theory to fact. #CIA trained #LeeHarveyOswald in 1957.
#4chan's [pol/ of course. Once again, #DJT keeps another promise
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Just ... damn.
Well...that doesn’t add to the conspiracy theory or anything.
Someone on that Twitter thread stated the image and claim have been floating around the net since 2005.
But I have no idea if that is accurate.
If true, that should be a warning for anyone considering the CIA as a career. They most certainly do not ‘have your back’ if you get into deep trouble. If true, the CIA treats it’s members like disposable merchandise, as in crippled bloodhounds or damaged bomb searching robots.
deep state claims another victim, 54 years on.
That doc is tagged as a hoax and I don’t see it in the official JFK file archives released to date.
I never believed any of the conspiracies...but damn....maybe the CIA did recruit him for this. They were fuming over the Bay of Pigs deal....just wow.
Seems to be fake according to the Twitter thread.
I have long held that the CIAs involvement was primarily after the fact and not in the planning. Rogue agents were involved and the CIA was trying to co er its collective a$$.
ok..its a hoax.....nevermind.
Where’s Freeper Buckhead when we need him? I’m not buying this one.
I just googled the sentence: “Oswald subject was trained, under cover of the office of Naval Intelligence, for Soviet assignments.”
The top search result shows the same image of this document form a reddit forum dated Nov 13, 2013.
More than that, THIS was already posted on Freerepublic on 4/28/2005...
Oswald was given a hardship discharge to go home and take care of his mother. Almost immediately he went to Russia. One of many things that doesn’t add up.
Who’s to say that the Soviets didn’t “flip” Oswald?
But on the other hand I highly doubt that they would risk starting WW3 unless they knew for sure that LBJ, Hoover, etc was in their pocket.
If Lee Harvey Oswald was CIA, then Jack Ruby was CYA.
I’m not a conspiracy theory type. There is nothing about 9/11 or the moon landing that raises even a hair of suspicion on me. All the conspiracy theory “evidence” is far better explained within the context of the official story, for those who know anything about science or how things work. But the JFK assassination has a few odd things about it that don’t add up. I’m still on the fence with that one.
Other than to Prove He was
What He said he was...
Discussion dated, 2006, so clearly not in the current batch
"We have only discussed this document a few times in the past. It is a fake and not that cleverly done.
John McAdams immediately suspected it was a fake and asked us if there is anything to confirm that it is indeed a fake.
When I looked at it I knew instantly that it was a fake. How? It is not written in the proper format using the proper CIA style. One tip off is the marking "CO-2-34,030." That is actually from a Secret Service report. How would I know? Because I had obtained and used on my Web site some of the pages from that SS report, so the notation jumped out as a fabrication. What someone did was take a page from the SS report, maybe even downloaded it from my Web page, removed the original text and wrote their own. Also the wording is not how the CIA would word a document of that type at that time. They would not refer to Hoover by name or agencies by common names. Instead you would see code words like ODACID. You need to look at hundreds of thousands of genuine CIA documents as I have to develop a mental database of what genuine CIA documents look like. I have no doubt that the hoaxer really thought that something like that was said. I don't think the intent was like the other hoaxes to discredit all JFK assassination research. I think someone just assumed that he knew enough to create a realistic fake to incriminate the CIA."
At the least, that has been around since 2006; so why are we hearing about it now? Someone's trying to stir the waters up.
That document has made the rounds long ago so, I'd be careful about it.
Anyone with the right equipment might be able to manufacture something like this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.