Posted on 10/28/2017 10:22:50 PM PDT by Enlightened1
Fake document, even though Oswald did not kill the president
Zactly...
He admitted to no such thing. That YouTube video has been debunked over and over again stop posting lies
There’s footage of WTC 7 burning all day long, stop posting crap.
Nor would any correspondence from the CIA say anything about Herbert Hoover keeping sensitive material under his personal possession; it’s preposterous.
If you don’t believe the conspiracy crap about WTC7 you’re a rational person. If you do you’re moron. There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that WTC 7 was pulled by a controlled demolition; that is not a term of art used in the demolition business. Firefighters had been trying to save that building all day and eventually gave up because the area was too unstable. The only thing surprising is that it took as long as it did to come down.
I’ve read what you say and agree. It’s laughable that someone would respond that Oswald knew Walker but a lot of this is what people have been told in conspiracy books.
I know Oswald also was interested in shooting at Nixon per Marina. I did not know that about Ike.
Good post.
Oswald was a Marine Russian linguist (learned Russian at Monterey, CA - Defense Linguistic Institute) and as such he either worked for USMC and possibly with Navy guys, or he most likely worked for DOD - depending on just what his service deployments were.
Did the CIA pick him up later, after his tour was finished?
You’re right. It wasn’t hit by anything as small as a mere aircraft.
Instead, it was hit by a couple hundred tons of burning debris from collapsing bldgs 1 and 2.
Oh, and it didn’t collapse into its own footprint. None of them did. They all dumped themselves all over the area, hitting other buildings to lesser or greater effect. Bldg 7 more or less slid sideways toward the center of the WTC site, i.e. toward the side most heavily damaged by the debris mentioned above.
Reading further down in the report - it states he “maintained a security clearance up to the level of Confidential”. Stop right there. I don’t know what was going on in ‘57 as it was before my time, but there is no way he could do the jobs ostensibly assigned to him according to the memo and have less than Top Secret Codeword. Confidential would not be high enough to even get on the base unless escorted by MPs.
It goes (for those that don’t know): Confidential (lowest), Secret, Top Secret; at that point clearances branch depending on the task, but Oswald’s next level would be Top Secret Codeword.
Oswald became a marine in ‘56, was courts-martialed twice in ‘58, and left the service in ‘59. If he was sent to linguist school by Office of Naval Intelligence, he had to have ALREADY been cleared for the assignments to come. I think the report uses some ‘code’ for what he was doing like “aerial reconnaissance of mainland China”. A clarence level of Confidential just does not fit.
That being his history, why would the CIA pick up this loser?
What “kooks” have been saying for years.
The deep state is real, was real. The one time in my life that I took a real look at the Kennedy assassination I came away convinced that Johnson did it. This is just more evidence that Oswald was one asset; there were more.
If true, that should be a warning for anyone considering the CIA as a career. They most certainly do not ‘have your back’ if you get into deep trouble.
When someone says CIA, think Mafia. Extortion, murder for hire, protection rackets, money laundering, gun and drug running. They’re no different, except the CIA is taxpayer funded, which is worse. Their allegiance is only to the members at the top of the organization.
Has anyone found the missing answer from the depo of richard helms as it pertains to oswald and CIA. This is actually a real document from file site.
Cia is willing to use anyone at anytime if it suits their purpose. They will use you up and spit you out
Dont forget mkultra ..just tip of Iceberg
“Cia is willing to use anyone at anytime if it suits their purpose.”
—
That is if the memo is real. Which I don’t think it is. Just too many odd statements/phrases in it that someone never in intel would think are true. like the whole matter of Oswald’s clearance level. Does not make sense
A plane used in cia renditions crashed in the Yucatan with a lot of sinaloa coke. Of course the plane had two quick sales before it crashed.
Cia doesnt get black ops funding from drug running
Ahem
No. That sentence from me doesnt have anything to do with that report.
It is just the way it was...and probably still is.
Look at felix sater..and what he was allowed to get away with while helping CIA and Loretta lynch
Which btw...likely included trying to retrieve cia stinger missiles from osama
Why not... Obama was CIA..
Just Google Business International Corporation.
Per Wiki:
Business International Corporation (BI) was a publishing and advisory firm dedicated to assisting American companies in operating abroad. It was founded in 1953. It organized conferences, and worked with major corporations. It had ties to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Former president Barack Obama worked there as a college graduate. In 1986, Business International was acquired by the Economist Group in London, and it eventually merged with the Economist Intelligence Unit.
If trump has vowed to release all info then he needs to find out why Helms answer to question about cia and oswald is missing. Just prior to the question he said he ducks questions in testimony.
Lets say helms said oswald was not cia at any time. Why not include the answer even if helms was known to lie
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.