To: blam
And in other news.....water is wet.
I wonder how $$ factored into the equation??
2 posted on
11/23/2017 9:30:24 AM PST by
rbg81
(Truth is stranger than fiction)
To: rbg81
I wonder how $$ factored into the equation??Aristotle Onassis set that standard. Ugly but rich.
22 posted on
11/23/2017 9:41:37 AM PST by
pfflier
To: rbg81
“I wonder how $$ factored into the equation??”
The more $$ you have, the better looking you are, even if you are hideous.
46 posted on
11/23/2017 9:56:09 AM PST by
euram
(4)
To: rbg81
47 posted on
11/23/2017 9:57:15 AM PST by
Kenny Bania
(Ovaltine? Why not call it Roundtine?)
To: rbg81
If you have a big bank account you can add at least 6 inches to your height.
To: rbg81
The participants were presented with photographs of men varying in both attractiveness and described as one of three dispositions:friendly, pleasing, or respectful. None of the above traits are of value in protecting a woman during pregnancy or while she's raising young children...
134 posted on
11/24/2017 3:43:36 AM PST by
GOPJ
(https://www.reddit.com/r/StumpSheet/comments/6ec3z1/fake_hate_crimes_official/)
To: rbg81
Money factors in, but much more so for older women. Those still in their prime fertility years are also looking for someone with good/healthy genes—and ugliness doesn’t connote that.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson