Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ford sues pro wrestler John Cena for reselling his 2017 GT supercar
Automotive News ^ | 12/1/17 | Michael Martinez

Posted on 12/03/2017 2:29:07 AM PST by LibWhacker

Ford Motor Co. is laying the legal smack down on WWE star John Cena.

The automaker on Thursday filed a lawsuit against the pro wrestler after Cena resold his 2017 Liquid Blue Ford GT supercar less than a month after owning it, breaking a contract that said the vehicle couldn't be flipped until two years after purchase.

Ford is seeking damages in excess of $75,000. It wants to buy back the vehicle for the price Cena paid ($463,376.50) and is seeking whatever profit Cena made off it.

"Upon information and belief, Mr. Cena has unfairly made a large profit from the unauthorized resale flip of the vehicle, and Ford has suffered additional damages and losses, including, but not limited to, loss of brand value, ambassador activity, and customer goodwill due to the improper sale," the automaker said in the lawsuit.

Ford last April instituted a rigorous application process for the first 500 supercars, which cost about $450,000 each. Ford at the time made clear that it would favor current GT owners as well as celebrities and influencers to ensure the cars would be seen and driven rather than stored in a museum or resold at high markups.

The lawsuit said Ford considered "each applicant's interest in Ford cars, specifically the GT and in collectible cars generally, each applicant's relationship with Ford, if any, and each applicant's involvement in the motorsports community, if any."

Cena completed his application on or about April 14, the lawsuit said. He reportedly said that the GT would go "to an owner who truly deserved it and would care properly for the car," and included photos and videos of himself promoting high-end cars.

Cena was approved, and paid for the vehicle in two installments, the last coming on Sept. 21. His vehicle was delivered to Elder Ford in Tampa, Fla., on Sept. 23.

Shortly thereafter, he recorded a four-minute video for his vlog, "John Cena: Auto Geek," in which he drives the GT out from the dealership.

He sold the car a few weeks later, the lawsuit says,"to liquidate for cash to take care of expenses."

Ford contacted him about it, and he allegedly apologized, saying "I completely understand and as stated am willing to work with you and Ford to make it right."

Cena is among a host of high-profile celebrities to get the supercar. Others include Houston Astros pitcher Justin Verlander, who posted a photo on Twitter earlier this month of his car. It's Ingot Silver with a white racing stripe.

Ford's top executives, including Chairman Bill Ford and President of Global Operations Joe Hinrichs have GTs. Former CEO Mark Fields is among the lucky buyers, too.

The three all chose the red-white-blue racing livery for their vehicles.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Sports
KEYWORDS: automakers; cena; ford; fordmotor; lawsuit; wrestler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
A deal's a deal, but companies that do this are just sleeeeeezy. After I buy something, it's mine, or should be. Just butt out, Ford!
1 posted on 12/03/2017 2:29:07 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Jay Leno also has one: https://youtu.be/7-MCdfqL61E


2 posted on 12/03/2017 2:34:46 AM PST by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I’m going to guess you aren’t a lawyer or a business owner...


3 posted on 12/03/2017 2:38:32 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

A contract is binding.

I am sure there were escape clauses in the contract to avoid these types of issues.

I am sure they will settle before this goes much further.


4 posted on 12/03/2017 2:45:05 AM PST by Vermont Lt (Burn. It. Down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

Good guess!


5 posted on 12/03/2017 2:45:53 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Not bad for 0545 hours.


6 posted on 12/03/2017 2:48:48 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

They made a deal, for the advertising value. He reneged. Seems pretty clear cut to me.


7 posted on 12/03/2017 2:57:46 AM PST by BykrBayb (Lung cancer free since 11/9/07. Colon cancer free since 7/7/15. Obama free since 1/20/17. PTL ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Jeremy Clarkson bought the same type of car years ago and went on a non stop tirade on Top Gear about what a useless piece of crap it was and he too got rid of it.


8 posted on 12/03/2017 2:58:13 AM PST by Daniel Ramsey (Thank YOU President Trump, finally we can do what America does best, to be the best)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

He signed a contract that stipulated that he could not sell the car for at least two years. By signing that contract, he was able to get a limited edition car that few others could own.


9 posted on 12/03/2017 3:02:24 AM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Enzo had black listed the Prince of Monaco for making a profit off of his F40 back then. The Prince bought it for a cool $300 thousand, sold it to his repairer a million who then flipped it for 3 million to someone else. Enzo was furious: “once you buy a Ferrari, you keep it out of love, not profit”.

So the Prince was never able to buy again from Enzo


10 posted on 12/03/2017 3:07:55 AM PST by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Ramsey

Try driving one into the setting sun.


11 posted on 12/03/2017 3:08:00 AM PST by Paladin2 (No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Technically he maybe wrong but bad public relations move by Ford.


12 posted on 12/03/2017 3:10:50 AM PST by McGruff (Lock Her Up! In a Padded Cell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll

It seems the Prince did not have the same love for the car as Enzo....


13 posted on 12/03/2017 3:13:57 AM PST by Enchante (Bill, Anthony, Harvey .... how does lesbo Hillary manage to surround herself with male predators???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Yes, I think Ford overestimated the intelligence of the general public. I think a large percentage of people are too stupid and immoral to understand this situation. Ford may have been better off pretending this cretin had done nothing wrong.


14 posted on 12/03/2017 3:26:31 AM PST by BykrBayb (Lung cancer free since 11/9/07. Colon cancer free since 7/7/15. Obama free since 1/20/17. PTL ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Drago

Very nice, thanks!


15 posted on 12/03/2017 3:27:05 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Good PR by Ford. No one ever heard of it before. Now everyone is looking at it. And, who cares what they do to a celebrity wrestler other than his accountant.


16 posted on 12/03/2017 3:31:21 AM PST by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb
I think a large percentage of people are too stupid and immoral to understand this situation.

I agree. Way too many people think they should just be able to walk away from a commitment, with no consequences, regardless of how much harm it does to others.

In this specific situation, people will think, "Oh, it's just a big, bad corporation. Who cares if they lose money?" Economic ignorance: "corporations" don't lose. Customers ultimately lose.

17 posted on 12/03/2017 3:32:29 AM PST by Tax-chick (I want to go to Colombia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

i disagree. many in the country are awakening to personal responsibility again through Trump and others reminding us that’s what most things are about.

Those awake will understand and see it for what it is. That’s all Ford is shining a light on as well. Their responsibility in this agreement and that of the buyer and agreement he signed.

Those worried about how things will look and not stepping on toes for fear of losing irresponsible customers who don’t take their agreement (signature and word) seriously, are not worth having anyway.


18 posted on 12/03/2017 3:33:33 AM PST by b4me (God Bless the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Try driving one into the setting sun.

Love to. :O)

19 posted on 12/03/2017 3:38:48 AM PST by HarleyD ("There are very few shades of grey."-Dr. Eckleburg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

The public perception of right and wrong has been muddied with exceptions to the rules. If we just stick to the rules, without making excuses, it’s pretty simple. If you make an agreement, keep it. Even if you made the agreement with somebody you don’t like. LOL


20 posted on 12/03/2017 3:39:30 AM PST by BykrBayb (Lung cancer free since 11/9/07. Colon cancer free since 7/7/15. Obama free since 1/20/17. PTL ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson