How UFO Reports Change With the Technology of the Times

Smithsonian ^

[Alas Babylon!]

Except they’re NOT photos. It’s CGI.

[stylin19a]

thanx. i understood and i understand. easier to say photos...article calls 'em photos.

All of these photos are computer generated forensic composite illustrations. None of them are official USAF photos.

thanks again.

[piasa]

Pull!

[bunkerhill7]

“The article simply states that observers see what their culture knows then describes the sighting in those terms”
I would not believe that 4 or 5 men see something in the sky and they all describe it exactly the same way. This is collective consciousness gone coocoo. All people can see stars at night. All people can actually see the planet Jupiter or the moon as a round ball or disc when it is close to earth. Gimme a break - When 4 or 5 Continental Army soldiers in 1776 describe a bright light moving on the horizon and then describe the very same thing flying over their heads, they do not call it a bright cannonball. Gimmme a break= I was majored in psychology at the university and I never heard of such BS. Recipio recipientur in modo recipientes. [bad latin] Various Native American cultures describe the same phenomena in the same ways in the myths and legends, not according to their individual tribal cultures which are thousands of miles apart.- Who can prove such ridiculous claims as stated above that- “observers see what their culture knows then describes the sighting in those terms? Plase show evidence to support this claim- otherwise it is pure hogwash.

[pfflier]

"I was majored in psychology at the university"

??

What "university"?

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks BenLurkin.

• The New York Times Fake UFO