Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deep-Space NASA Rocket Engines Perform Most Powerful Ignition Test Yet
Space.com ^ | February 25, 2018 08:29am ET | Doris Elin Salazar, Contributor |

Posted on 02/25/2018 9:31:24 PM PST by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: fidelis

I’ll let NASA explain it all for you...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pVm7p4nkwo

LOL LOL LOL!

There is no thrust in a vacuum, no air, no friction, no oxygen for ignition... which explains the fake Shuttle videos.


21 posted on 02/26/2018 9:34:46 PM PST by Sontagged (Lord Jesus, please frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised in Your Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cyclotic

Please have your son the space engineer explain this fake Shuttle footage.

Maybe he knows who the “Big Head” is in the shot?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pVm7p4nkwo


22 posted on 02/26/2018 9:36:42 PM PST by Sontagged (Lord Jesus, please frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised in Your Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GingisK

You are right about deep space but wrong on moon landing. We never been there.


23 posted on 02/26/2018 10:07:04 PM PST by taxesareforever (Islam is an ideology. It is NOT a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If space is a vacuum, then who is on the other end sucking it?


24 posted on 02/26/2018 10:14:53 PM PST by wxgesr (I wanna be the first person to surf on another planet....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
Yes, we went to the moon. Only ignorant people believe otherwise. Much of that tripe is based upon flawed photo analysis by people who do not understand "exposure latitude" and "film reciprocity" affects.

They didn't go straight through the Van Allan belts either. The trajectory was through a fringe of the belts, through the hole in the doughnut.

We went to the moon, young one.

25 posted on 02/27/2018 4:04:03 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
You are right about deep space but wrong on moon landing. We never been there.

The earth is flat and Columbus never discovered America either!

26 posted on 02/27/2018 4:19:12 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged
There is no thrust in a vacuum, no air, no friction, no oxygen for ignition

  1. Rockets carry their oxidizer with them and don't need external oxygen
  2. Rockets work using conservation of momentum, not "friction"
  3. Why haven't you answered my question about a rifle in a vacuum?

27 posted on 02/27/2018 4:38:26 AM PST by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Yes and an oxidizer is not released until the initial start of burning. It only works in air. You need air to start the burning. Try to ignite gunpower with an oxidizer in a vacuum chamber. It will not start to burn. If space is a vacuum there is nothing to push against and even a oxidizer will not start to burn. The experiment already has been demonstrated. It is time to realized you have been lied to about space. Do the experiment for yourself.


28 posted on 02/27/2018 4:50:42 AM PST by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Campion

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtJT5gFwNjg Here is one. Find the other for yourself or just believe a Satanist lie.


29 posted on 02/27/2018 4:52:29 AM PST by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Campion
Can you explain why NASA writes the word "SEX" on their faked composite Blue Marble earth photos? https://thecoincidencetheorist.com/space/finding-sex-on-nasas-epic-earth-image-once-you-see-it-you-wont-unsee-it/ And it's not just on this idiotically faked 2015 Earth photo, it's on their 2012 one, too.
30 posted on 02/27/2018 10:02:04 AM PST by Sontagged (Lord Jesus, please frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised in Your Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle; taxesareforever; Campion; cyclotic; fidelis; rlmorel
Excellent, thank you:

Yes and an oxidizer is not released until the initial start of burning. It only works in air. You need air to start the burning. Try to ignite gunpower with an oxidizer in a vacuum chamber. It will not start to burn. If space is a vacuum there is nothing to push against and even a oxidizer will not start to burn. The experiment already has been demonstrated. It is time to realized you have been lied to about space. Do the experiment for yourself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtJT5gFwNjg Here is one. Find the other for yourself or just believe a Satanist lie.

All of those (long discontinued) science labs I took in grammar school come in handy. It's macabre how FReepers don't seem to understand basic science.

Kids today are taught nothing, on purpse, and it is a Satanist lie.

BTW, most people believe the reason they write the word "SEX" on their faked Blue Marble earth composites (both in 2015 and 2012) is because it has to do with some satanic rune or spell concerning sex.

"Finding SEX On NASA's Epic Earth Image: Once You See It You Won't Unsee It"

https://thecoincidencetheorist.com/space/finding-sex-on-nasas-epic-earth-image-once-you-see-it-you-wont-unsee-it/

31 posted on 02/27/2018 10:33:17 AM PST by Sontagged (Lord Jesus, please frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised in Your Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

and I assume you are some sort of weird Jester:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtJT5gFwNjg

No air movement in a vacuum.

No rocket ignition in a vacuum.

No engine thrust in a vacuum.

Sorry, you’ve been hoaxed along with the rest of us.

Now, clean up your act, get right with the Lord Jesus and get your head on straight about the enormity of Deep State lies and hoaxes so you will no longer be part of the problem.


32 posted on 02/27/2018 7:45:55 PM PST by Sontagged (Lord Jesus, please frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised in Your Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

There are some who believe that, even though I am not one of them. I could go into all the reasons that it is truly improbable that America put men on the moon and none of them have to do with photos. But I would never convince you and therefore I will leave you to believe in the greatest conspiracy ever concocted by the U.S.


33 posted on 02/27/2018 10:08:19 PM PST by taxesareforever (Islam is an ideology. It is NOT a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged

“and I assume you are some sort of weird Jester”

There is no air movement in a vacuum as there is no air.

Rockets can ignite in a vacuum.

There is engine thrust in a vacuum.

In my posts I try (but doubtfully always succeed) to not waste readers’ time. I fear I’m wasting reader’s time here but your untruths need to be refuted.


34 posted on 02/28/2018 4:52:06 AM PST by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

Your post is macabre. By your logic, fires would start instantaneously every minute of the day.

If this was sixty years ago, you would have been laughed out of grammar school, high school, college and any other place educated people discussed simple science.

Now, you’re either brainwashed, braindead or a Deep State paid troll.


35 posted on 03/03/2018 12:15:13 AM PST by Sontagged (Lord Jesus, please frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised in Your Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged

Take liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen, put them together, and add a spark, and you will get ignition


36 posted on 03/03/2018 12:46:24 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged

“Your post is macabre.”

Rocket engines don’t need atmospheric oxygen.


37 posted on 03/03/2018 5:52:01 AM PST by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

No thrust in an absolute vacuum.


38 posted on 03/04/2018 3:52:02 PM PST by Sontagged (Lord Jesus, please frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised in Your Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

But they need thrust, so what is your point?


39 posted on 03/04/2018 3:52:41 PM PST by Sontagged (Lord Jesus, please frogmarch Your enemies behind You as You've promised in Your Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Sontagged

“But they need thrust, so what is your point?”

An atmosphere is not needed to obtain thrust.


40 posted on 03/05/2018 4:30:44 AM PST by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson