Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Yorkers ‘lose hope’ while applying again and again for city’s affordable housing lottery
WPIX, CW 11, NYC ^ | 03:02 PM, February 27, 2018 | Shirley Chan

Posted on 02/28/2018 10:46:43 PM PST by Olog-hai

As any New Yorker knows, finding an apartment is not easy. The city’s affordable housing lottery was set up to assist residents, but applying for the lottery takes time and patience.

Brooklyn resident Maria Martinez told PIX11 she’s been applying faithfully for 20 years, since the inception of the lottery program. Speaking through a translator, she said the process is frustrating. “You keep applying. You hope you end up with a home, but it hasn’t happened for me yet,” Martinez said.

Martinez currently rents a one-bedroom apartment in Williamsburg. She lives with her husband and two teenage children. “Sometimes I do lose hope, but I apply anyway and you just hope, keep applying and keep insisting,” Martinez said. “It’d be wonderful if they could tell you that you even lost it, but they don’t tell you. You just never get any notice back and then later on, you find out the building has been filled up.”

Martinez’s situation is like countless other New Yorkers’. The NYC Department of Housing Preservation and Development is the agency that oversees the lottery. The statistics from HPD are stark. There are currently 1,144 affordable housing units available in 18 buildings. According to HPD, on average, there are 700 applicants per unit. They’ve set up the online Housing Connect portal, streamlining the online application process. There are 1.7 million registered users of the site. …

(Excerpt) Read more at pix11.com ...


TOPICS: Cheese, Moose, Sister; Local News; Society
KEYWORDS: affordablehousing; aliens; deblasio; housinglottery; illegals; newyork; nyc; rentcontrol; sanctuarycity; socialism; socialwelfare; welfarestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: GnuThere

And two teenaged kids.

Can’t afford a roof but...


21 posted on 03/01/2018 4:12:38 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Ask a lib if Alger Hiss colluded with the Russians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

But Broadway, museums, finance, culture, Hipsterlandia,....

(things the locals don’t go to)


22 posted on 03/01/2018 4:13:52 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Ask a lib if Alger Hiss colluded with the Russians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

hOW MUCH IS HER RENT NOW AND HOW DOES SHE AFFORD IT?


23 posted on 03/01/2018 5:47:52 AM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The problem begins with millions of apartments grandfathered in to the occupants of rent-controlled, rent-stabilized, and rent subsidized apartments, which takes them all off the market, which shrinks the supply of apartments at market rates, raises the asked-for rents at market rates and helps MANUFACTURE (in addition to the zoning laws) the demand for “affordable” housing.

There is plenty of “affordable housing” in NYC - IF you are already an occupant in one of the rent-controlled apartments. If you are a new resident, or you move within the city, you are chasing after a supply shrunk by the rent-controlled give-aways already occupied.


24 posted on 03/01/2018 5:59:09 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
There is no market based reason for a shortage of housing in New York City. Part of the issue is rent control, which was instituted as a wartime measure during World War II. Another factor is the effect of zoning laws, environmental regulations, historical preservation rules, NIMBY attitudes, etc., which make construction of new housing difficult and expensive. This is a problem throughout the country, but particularly in the Northeast and West Coast. In a densely concentrated city like New York, there is no good reason to preserve old residential or commercial buildings dating to the 19th and early 20th Centuries simply because of their age. If Washington slept there in 1778, preservation is justified. If Paddy O'Donnell or Heinz Kruger slept there in 1878 and Vito D’Angelo or Irving Cohen slept there in 1928, not so much. Additionally, liberal politicians, though anti-highway and pro-mass transit, get little of the latter constructed, and usually with huge cost overruns. These same politicians do poor jobs in updating water and sewer lines or ensuring that public schools are more than places to contain children between 5 and 17, and even then not safely.
25 posted on 03/01/2018 6:02:50 AM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GnuThere

I didn’t think English was that hard to learn. But many Italians never learned English after moving to the US in the early part of the 20th century.


26 posted on 03/01/2018 6:04:32 AM PST by AppyPappy (Don't mistake your dorm political discussions with the desires of the nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose

Immigrating to the US legally is not that expensive. The flight to the US costs more than the processing fees here in the US. But if you are not a citizen, it can be very difficult.


27 posted on 03/01/2018 6:07:23 AM PST by AppyPappy (Don't mistake your dorm political discussions with the desires of the nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

So the good news is that rent-controlled apartments are cheap. The bad news is that there are none available.
NYC is messed up.


28 posted on 03/01/2018 6:10:17 AM PST by AppyPappy (Don't mistake your dorm political discussions with the desires of the nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.

Exactly!

Rent control (or any price control) only does one thing: decreases the supply and quality of ANYTHING it is applied to.

Meaning no housing, and what you can get...sucks. Nothing new being built.


29 posted on 03/01/2018 6:16:56 AM PST by rlmorel (Leftists: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

I know someone whose mom spends most of her time living out of the country, but her name is on the lease and her checking account pays the rent. I have suggested that all we need to do is just make sure the death notice never gets to the U.S. (and no the adult children’s names are not on the lease as joint lease-holders).


30 posted on 03/01/2018 6:24:01 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GnuThere

EXACTLY——NOT a person who wishes to ASSIMILATE...

No wonder we have problems.

Do I get to guess how much $$$ she contributes to this country in taxes on earned income???


31 posted on 03/01/2018 6:58:09 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
There are plenty of inexpensive places to live in big cities but no sane person wants to live there. The affordable housing programs are just bribes to developers to reserve a few places below market prices.
32 posted on 03/01/2018 6:58:27 AM PST by Kid Shelleen ((Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Our CA town requires developers to set aside “below market rate” units in every new project. Maybe 1 out of 1,000 win the lottery. “””

Keep in mind that the other purchasers of those new units pay for the difference in price for the break on the ‘below market rate’ units.

IF 10% are ‘low income’, the other 90% of the units MUST be priced higher to make up the difference for the developer.


33 posted on 03/01/2018 7:00:09 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Are you SURE about that? I heard the magical free housing fairy built those units at zero cost and nobody else was paying a higher price to subsidize those “life’s lottery” winners.


34 posted on 03/01/2018 7:31:49 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: noiseman

I was inspired by the headline, to be honest.


35 posted on 03/01/2018 8:43:39 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I still don’t understand the concept of rent control.


36 posted on 03/01/2018 8:45:18 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Just read the first plank of communism (scroll to bottom of that page) and it will probably make sense after that, i.e. what the politicians intend.
37 posted on 03/01/2018 8:54:37 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

You’d think that in 20 years she could have learned English.


38 posted on 03/01/2018 9:59:54 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson