1 posted on
03/19/2018 4:09:06 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Oumuamua Oumuamua Oumuamua Oumuamua Oumuamua Oumuamua
Have you heard about the bird?
2 posted on
03/19/2018 4:11:58 PM PDT by
rfp1234
(I have already previewed this composition.)
To: BenLurkin
it is indeed an alien invader, what with a name sooooo very, very similar to Obummer’s
3 posted on
03/19/2018 4:12:22 PM PDT by
faithhopecharity
("Politicans aren't born, they're excreted." -Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
To: BenLurkin
“Jackson and his colleagues performed computer-modeling work, which indicated that systems with two close-orbiting stars boot out asteroids much more efficiently than one-star systems do.”
I bet their computer models also proved that global warming played a part in this.
4 posted on
03/19/2018 4:31:55 PM PDT by
MeganC
(There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
To: BenLurkin
But 'Oumuamua probably didn't come from a system like our own, according to the new study. Jackson and his colleagues performed computer-modeling work, which indicated that systems with two close-orbiting stars boot out asteroids much more efficiently than one-star systems do. Once again, our brightest scientists have created a computer model that explains how the universe works. I wonder if they could also create a model to tell me where to invest so I wont run out of money in retirement.
5 posted on
03/19/2018 4:35:11 PM PDT by
Purdue77
(Okay, I'm too cheap to afford a tag line.)
To: BenLurkin
If most star systems are binaries, how does that make this weirder?
To: BenLurkin
Jackson and his colleagues performed computer-modeling work, which indicated that systems with two close-orbiting stars boot out asteroids much more efficiently than one-star systems do.
Which means that, one-star systems ALSO eject objects.
So, we really don't know where yo-mauma came from.
Then, if an object gets "strategically" placed between 2 large objects, like Jupiter and the Sun, the object can be sent careening out of a one-star system too.
So, the computer model is lacking in "diversity" of scenarios.
9 posted on
03/19/2018 5:05:26 PM PDT by
adorno
To: BenLurkin
And there are a lot of these binary systems out there; previous research has suggested that more than half of all Milky Way stars have close stellar companions.
...
So it’s not weird as the title says.
11 posted on
03/19/2018 5:13:16 PM PDT by
Moonman62
(Make America Great Again!)
To: BenLurkin
” ‘Oumuamua Likely Had 2 Stars”
Is that like “Heather Has Two Mommies?”
13 posted on
03/19/2018 5:17:44 PM PDT by
PLMerite
("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too." - Robert Conquest)
To: BenLurkin
Sounds like they are stretching what little they know about this object until the data screams for mercy.
Funny, I don’t much trust “experts” any more. Wonder why?
14 posted on
03/19/2018 6:11:46 PM PDT by
Some Fat Guy in L.A.
(Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
To: BenLurkin
” systems with two close-orbiting stars boot out asteroids much more efficiently than one-star systems do. “
Well when you turn 18 million years old, you get kicked out of the solar system house.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson