Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Fox News cancels Laura Ingraham, it might as well close the network
Legal Insurrection ^ | April 1, 2018 | William A. Jacobson

Posted on 04/02/2018 7:06:32 AM PDT by C19fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: C19fan

Since I understand Ms.Ingraham is a person of faith...

Mark 8:36-37.

Ms. Ingraham, if it was a choice between your job or the apology, you should have quit.


61 posted on 04/02/2018 9:51:18 AM PDT by mewzilla (Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Bookmark


62 posted on 04/02/2018 9:53:05 AM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

Of what value are the big parties when bad things happen.

Dr. Martin Luther King was rumored to be running for president in 1967 but he said this about politics instead.

On April 25, 1967 he said:

“I have come to think of my role as one which operates outside the realm of partisan politics raising the issues and through action create the situation which forces whatever party in power to act creatively and constructively in response to the dramatic presentations of these issues on the public scene.”

Hooray for MLK and the Bundy’s and others who take action to get the politicians attention and demonstrate to the world the politicians desire to control people with brutal force and not to change things in a positive direction.


63 posted on 04/02/2018 1:46:32 PM PDT by Nextrush (Freedom is everybody's business: Remember Pastor Niemoller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush
Hooray for MLK and the Bundy’s and others who take action to get the politicians attention and demonstrate to the world the politicians desire to control people with brutal force and not to change things in a positive direction.

Despite his flaws, I've come to see that MLK was a great man—qualitatively superior to the modern charlatans who have enriched themselves by exploiting his legacy.

MLK was a uniter, and he was a staunch believer in firm but peaceful protest for change. MLK would be utterly appalled at what the modern Civil Rights movement has become, with its constant race-baiting and lack of accountability in leadership. MLK—in my experience—was anything but a "hate Whitey" type of sellout. Modern leaders such as Al Sharpton and such ilk weren't fit to tie MLK's shoes.

Despite his flaws, MLK was simply a better man than his successors—who aren't nearly in the same class.

Was MLK any more flawed than any of the Founding Fathers, for instance? Objectively, probably not. He's another great example of a man whose words were much bigger than any flaws he possessed. I believe that today's Whites do a disservice to the 60's Civil Rights movement and MLK when they conflate today's race hustlers with MLK and the causes and methods he employed...

64 posted on 04/02/2018 2:01:29 PM PDT by sargon ("If the President doesn't drain the Swamp, the Swamp will drain the President.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson