Posted on 05/01/2018 7:16:44 AM PDT by WisconsinRep
Israel began sharing an intelligence trove on Iran's alleged nuclear ambitions Tuesday, but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faced accusations his televised unveiling of it lacked evidence a 2015 accord had been violated.
The IAEA, the United Nations atomic watchdog, said it would evaluate any new relevant information, but cited its assessment from three years ago that it had no "credible indications" of an Iranian nuclear weapons pursuit after 2009.
...
Some analysts and proponents of the nuclear agreement also said Netanyahu had presented previously known details and failed to produce evidence that showed Iran was not abiding by the accord.
"I have not seen from Prime Minister Netanyahu arguments for the moment on non-compliance, meaning violation by Iran of its nuclear commitments under the deal," European Union diplomatic chief Federica Mogherini said.
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
Of course they fail to convince these traitors. They knew this all along.
Well, exactly what _would_ evidence that the agreement had been violated?
why are the iranian power points in English?
something ain’t right here.
Upton Sinclair — ‘It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.’
Enough talk.
The “deal proponents” have no interest in reality.
They are the same clowns who pretend “the deal is working”, as though the world has unfettered access to inspect Iran’s facilities at will.
The “deal” is NOT preventing war, it is only helping Iran to have an advantage when the war comes.
No one will admit that ‘The Jew’, as they see him, is right about this.
All of whom were doing big biz with Iran even before sanctions were lifted.
They’re in bed with the mullahs. Of course they’re “unconvinced”.
Snort.
That is the only reasonable counter-proliferation policy at this point.
Wait till they find out about what was bombed in N Syria a few days ago!
something ain’t right here.
Those silly Jews are so foolish that they created fakes in English because they knew Americans couldn't read Farsi.
Yeah, that makes a lot more sense than the possibility that they translated them for us.
Smartest people in the world, and you think they would be so stupid?
Imagine your commentary if they were presented only in Arabic script......
We should have gone to war with Iran in 1979, but we had an idiot P***y for a President back then, and the world has been a worse place ever since because of it.
To the idiots who voted for Stupid Carter, thank you for really screwing up the world.
like they are only trying to determine the number of licks to the chocolaty center of a tootsie pop.
the answer.... three.
Exactly!
The problem when assessing the time to complete the weaponization, is that there is no way to measure competency.
Either in the staff or equipment.
We know what the key steps are, but no accurate way of estimating time to completion.
The issue of Iran reminds me of a famous quote I heard somewhere......
“peace in our time”
That one did not work out so well, but perhaps this time will be different. /s
something ain’t right here.
Considering that most of them studied here or in the West, it may not be that unusual...
We wouldn’t have had any need for war if Carter wouldn’t have given Iran to terrorists...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.