Skip to comments.Building Blocks of Life Found on Mars
Posted on 06/07/2018 11:21:25 AM PDT by Simon Green
Day to day, its easy to lose sight of an astonishing fact: Since 2012, humankind has been driving a nuclear-powered sciencemobile the size of an SUV on another planet.
This engineering marvel, NASAs Mars rover Curiosity, has revolutionized our understanding of the red planet. And thanks to the intrepid rover, we now know that ancient Mars had carbon-based compounds called organic moleculeskey raw materials for life as we know it.
A new study published in Science on Thursday presents the first conclusive evidence for large organic molecules on the surface of Mars, a pursuit that began with NASAs Viking landers in the 1970s. Earlier tests may have hinted at organics, but the presence of chlorine in martian dirt complicated those interpretations.
When you work with something as crazy as a rover on Mars, with the most complex instrument ever sent to space, it seems like were doing what may have been perceived earlier as impossible, says lead author Jennifer Eigenbrode, a biogeochemist at NASA Goddard. I work with an amazing group of people on Mars, and we have discovered so much.
Curiosity's latest data reveal that the watery lake that once filled Marss Gale Crater contained complex organic molecules about 3.5 billion years ago. Hints of them are still preserved in sulfur-spiked rocks derived from lake sediments. Sulfur may have helped protect the organics even when the rocks were exposed at the surface to radiation and bleach-like substances called perchlorates.
By themselves, the new results aren't evidence for ancient life on Mars; non-living processes could have yielded identical molecules. At a minimum, the study shows how traces of bygone martians could have survived for eonsif they existed at alland it hints at where future rovers might look for them.
This is an important finding, says Samuel Kounaves, a Tufts University chemist and former lead scientist for NASA's Phoenix Mars lander. There are locations, especially subsurface, where organic molecules are well-preserved.
In addition to ancient carbon, Curiosity has caught whiffs of organics that exist on Mars today. The rover has periodically sniffed Marss atmosphere since it landed, and in late 2014, researchers using these data showed that methanethe simplest organic moleculeis present in Marss atmosphere.
Methanes presence on Mars is puzzling, because it survives only a few hundred years at a time, which means that somehow, something on the red planet keeps replenishing it. Its a gas in the atmosphere of Mars that really shouldnt be there," says NASA Jet Propulsion Lab scientist Chris Webster.
I suspect cows.
Marvin the Martian farted. That’s why he calls the Space modulator a PEW-36
This is the kind of statement that shows how some scientists have difficulty admitting that they don't know all there is to know about science.
It's incredibly arrogant to say that something shouldn't be there when it now has shown to be there. But, he couldn't just say, "We don't know why it's there."
That’s funny right there.
The Martian dry cleaners destroyed the planet with their perchlorate...
Petrol still in Gene Hunt’s Cortina?
Maybe leaked oil?
As there was once a cow that jumped over the moon back in my verbal ancestral tales millions of years ago when I was a child who is really to say maybe a few made it to Mars?
Jennifer, don't let the cat out of the bag! There are no Martians. Repeat again, there are no Martians...
Global warming! They're driving a Rover around on Mars. Mankind is polluting the Martian atmosphere! /s
Was just thinking the same thing.
Maybe, when the cow jumped over the moon, she actually went further and landed on Mars — and farts occasionally.
I think you are mistaking a figure of speech for a dogmatic assertion. We all use figures of speech in common everyday language. “I love meatballs,” or “I’m sweating my ass off.” There are literally thousands of examples. The scientist saying “that shouldn’t be there” is using a figure of speech to say it is something unexpected, something new to add to his knowledge and to be explored. Not arrogance, but wonder.
There is actually a youtube video that makes the claim, based on the substances that have been found on mars, that it was wiped out by a nuclear war.
That’s correct. Also — it is a noteworthy statement because it indicates a surprise finding.
Could be cows but my guess is volcanoes.
Do you think that if Russia, or India, or China had successfully landed a nuclear-powered robot on the surface of Mars, and driven it around doing science for five years, they would have graciously assigned credit for their achievement to "humankind" ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.