Posted on 07/16/2018 5:13:51 PM PDT by FL_Native
We’ve seen so many people’s lives ruined and now they want to start a war with Russia over accusations. Can’t we wait until after these accusations have been proven in a court of law?
Fire away
I don’t know. Let’s ask Paul Manafort.
Incompatible with Mob Rule Amerika, why do you ask?
Right. The press and the Uniparty are caught up in the hysteria. First they preach to us about respecting the rule of law, the investigative process, etc., then in the next breath they assume guilt by accusation. It’s like we’re all back in high school.
Lets ask the thousands of men who gets false rape and dv charges filed against them from women.
I’m not sure I understand what you mean...
They never will go to court. Mueller knows Russia will never turn over 12 of their agents to us, any more than we would turn over 12 CIA agents based on a Russian indictment. So Mueller can avoid ever releasing anything he has to Congress or the public because it’s part of an “ongoing case”. He will never have to issue a statement that exonerates Trump. Meanwhile Trump’s foes can (they already are) point to the indictments as “proof” that it’s not a witch hunt.
That’s just the first thing that comes to my mind when i hear someone accused of a crime and I haven’t heard that phrase used in a long time. Just kinda thinking out loud
There are many who don’t want it sorted out by a trail. law.
Notice how Wikileaks is not being mentioned?
Their conspiracy theory is that Wikileaks got the internal memos showing the MSM-Clinton criminal conspiracy to rig the primary from Russia.
Mulehead’s conspiracy is about a spam email that was opened with a phishing virus.
And we were assured that Hillary’s unsecured server was not hacked but it was never examined.
buncha people in the media and congress talking a lot of convoluted crap today
Exactly what I was referring to
I think it’s interesting that they are pushing the first case, what is it Concorde, and meeting resistance from Mueller
There is zero actionable evidence that anybody ever hacked the DNC. The FBI never examined the servers in question and Crowdstrike has very weak credibility. Once the DNC let another party (Crowdstrike) tinker around their server, that destroyed the value any evidence there may have once been there. Nobody will ever be tried/convicted of hacking the DNC and everybody, including the media and the swamp thug Mueller, knows that is a fact.
Currently locked up in pre-trial solitary confinement by an Obama appointed federal judge. Bail revoked. Put in the “deep cooler” to break him.
Total abuse of judicial power for political purposes.
Mob Rule is only moderated by superior force, and the legal principles that Might Makes Right and Most Might Makes Historical Right.
Is there anything we can do? Why aren’t we screaming this from the rooftops?
Innocent until proven guilty? Is that in that old stupid sheepskin under glass in DC? What a horrible concept. You can’t control the outcome at all that way!
About the same thing as:
It is the seriousness of the allegations/charges, not the substance of the evidence.
==
It is part of smear campaigns, politics of personal destruction, scorched earth.
Clinton was running for President of the USA on planet Earth. She needed to win no matter what other countries wanted. That is life on this planet. She couldn’t do it. It’s not Trump’s fault nor is it Russia’s fault that she couldn’t win outright. She had every opportunity between seizures to set the American people straight. Explain why poor Seth Rich, who worked for her, was upset enough to get her emails to WikiLeaks. What was his motivation? What brought him down? Hillary ran by the sword, she needed to be ready to lose by the sword.
It’s just Trump bashing. If Putin had surrender Russia to the USA they still would say Trump was wrong to except it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.