[colorado tanker]

The Zuck dint learn much at Harvard.

You don't justify this policy on whether someone got it a little wrong or a lot wrong or didn't think they were wrong at all.

You base and justify your policy on free speech grounds. You value free speech unless the speech would incite violence or otherwise endanger someone.

And I mean real violence, not the PC definition of someone frowning at you or saying something you don't like.

[katana]

Agreed. And what, among so many things, modern Liberals and their ill educated snowflakes get wrong about "Hate Speech" is that the more it's suppressed the more attractive and credible it can become to some. It's not much different than any other type of prohibition. It can glamorize what would otherwise be disregarded.

And the broader they define it into anything with which they disagree the less effective their tantrums become. Thankfully, most of them are too dumbed down and indoctrinated to understand this and so they continue to dig that hole to irrelevancy.