Posted on 08/02/2018 10:16:47 AM PDT by Red Badger
Legislation that would dramatically increase an important contribution limit just cleared a major hurdle.
The House of Representatives recently passed two pieces of legislation that would make significant changes to health savings accounts (HSAs), including a massive increase in the amount of tax-deferred contributions that could be made to them. These changes could not only allow Americans to get more of a tax deduction for their healthcare expenditures, but they could also help participants build their retirement nest eggs at a faster rate.
Here's a rundown of what the new HSA contribution limit could be, why it matters for retirement savings, and some of the other changes the bills would make.
The HSA contribution limit could nearly double
One of the major provisions in the HSA bill known as the Increasing Access to Lower Premium Plans and Expanding Health Savings Accounts Act would dramatically increase the annual contribution limit to these accounts.
For 2018, the maximum HSA contribution is $3,450 for individual health plans or $6,850 for family health coverage. The bill would nearly double these limits, to $6,650 (individual) and $13,300 (family).
The reason for the change? These new limits would be identical to the out-of-pocket maximums that high-deductible health plan participants can be required to pay. The idea is that people will be allowed to contribute enough to their HSAs to cover every possible healthcare expenditure they could face. Wait -- why does the HSA limit matter for retirement savings?
If you're not too familiar with how HSAs work, you may be wondering why I'm discussing them in the context of retirement savings. However, there's a very good reason.
There are a few excellent features of the HSA that makes this account type an excellent retirement savings vehicle, as well as a great way to help manage healthcare costs. Specifically:
HSA contributions are made on a tax-deferred basis, so you get a current-year tax deduction for contributing. Plus, any withdrawals for qualified healthcare expenses are tax-free. An HSA is the only tax-advantaged account that offers this type of double tax benefit. After you contribute, you can invest your HSA funds in a variety of investment options, similar to a 401(k). HSA funds carry over from year to year, so any funds that you don't use to cover healthcare expenses (and the investment returns they generate) can accumulate in the account. Once you turn 65, you can withdraw HSA funds penalty-free for any reason. So you can use them in the same way you'd use any other retirement savings. After 65, withdrawals will be considered taxable income, just as in a traditional IRA or 401(k) -- unless they are used for healthcare costs. The average 65-year-old couple can expect to spend $275,000 on healthcare expenses throughout their retirement, so there should be plenty of opportunities for HSA funds to be used completely tax-free in retirement.
In a nutshell, an HSA has some of the great retirement savings benefits of traditional IRAs or 401(k) accounts, but with the bonus of tax-deductible withdrawals if you need to use your money for medical expenses.
So if participants choose to use their HSA as a retirement savings vehicle, the proposed higher HSA contribution limits could allow them to significantly increase their tax-advantaged retirement savings while maintaining the flexibility to use their money for healthcare expenses if they need it sooner. And after retirement, participants can use HSA funds on a double-tax-advantaged basis to help cover their healthcare cost burden.
To be clear, you need to have a qualifying high-deductible health plan to be eligible to use an HSA to save. Specifically, you need to have a healthcare policy with a deductible of at least $1,350 for an individual or $2,700 for a family. Other HSA changes contained in the bills
It's also important to mention that the HSA bills that passed the House would do a whole lot more than raising the HSA contribution limits. Here's a rundown of some of the most significant changes they would make in their current form:
HSA funds could be used to purchase over-the-counter (OTC) medications and health products. Currently, this is not an option, and allowing HSA funds to be used for OTC products could help people save money. Individuals whose spouses are enrolled in a flexible spending account, but who otherwise qualify for an HSA, would be allowed to contribute to an account. Currently, doing so is prohibited. High-deductible health plans would be allowed to cover as much as $250 annually for an individual, or $500 for a family, for certain services on a pre-deductible basis.
What's next for the HSA bills?
These bills have only passed the House. They still need to clear the Senate before they can become law, and they're likely to face some significant resistance there. Many Senate Democrats aren't fans of the high-deductible health plans that HSAs are designed to complement, and the bills will need some degree of bipartisan support to pass.
Having said that, there is a lot in these bills that should make both sides of the political spectrum happy, so there's a realistic chance that they could make it through the Senate in the not too distant future and become law.
Available to people only if A) their company offers an HSA, which they can do only if B) they offer a high-deductible health care plan option.
Your company doesn't need to offer them, privates banks and investment companies do. Key Bank offers one.
I’d like to see them eliminate the carryover penalty. I mean, you can only use it for healthcare, so why can’t you carry over and just add less to the HSA the next year, if you choose?
The last time I participated in one of those was over 20 years ago. I ended up using none of the money and lost it all.
ahhh…...My brother has a friend who just took a job selling health insurance plans for a BANK. I wondered what that could be about. Apparently the bank anticipated this move. Thanks for solving the mystery!
I’m a financially sophisticated guy, and HSAs are just too much of a hassle. I know there are advantages there somewhere, somehow, but I just can’t bring myself to invest in fully understanding and leveraging.
What is the average Joe going to do?
Nothing.
The government needs the serfs to squirrel away more of their own money, of course, on very strict terms, to be taken later on to pay for another ridiculous government crony-capitalist policy failure known in America as “health care.”
To the best of my knowledge, an HSA does not have a carryover penalty. Might you be thinking of FSAs (Flexible Spending Account)?
It’s just a regular bank account and the “title” is HSA just like it could be an IRA, it’s how it’s registered. Tax free accumulation and withdrawals for life - excellent idea.
That was probably an “FSA” flexible spending account. In an HSA you do not forfeit the balance at the end of the year, you can keep it (though it still must be used only for health care expenditures).
That’s my main bitch also. Use it or lose it...................
Quite correct. I have an HSA with Key Bank. It offers access checks and even pays a piddly rate of interest.
That’s probably what it is.....it’s my husband’s workplace. But with the FSA we can only use it for healthcare costs.....would be nice to be able to carry over what’s left to the next year without a penalty.
It's like a ROTH IRA, tax free accumulation and withdrawals, for HSA's they need to be health expenses.
I’ve had an HSA for nearly 6 years. Other than one exception, I have been in relatively good health the entire time. But due to the one procudure I’ve had, I’ve only accumulated a net total of barely $5k in my account.
HSAs are a great concept in my opion. It’s your money, and it comes out of your payroll pre-tax (if you have one through an employer) but they can only used for medical or health expenses... but the great thing is, IT’S YOUR MONEY! You are not paying some insurance company and agents who get to keep it if you don’t get sick. You get to keep it.
But back to what I was originally saying, the pre-tax limits are too small compared to how high medical/healtcare related expenses are these days. It’s a really wonderful idea to consider that if a young person could get an HSA in their twenties, and live in relatively good health for a few decades, they will have built up a substantial account to cover medical problems they may encounter in life beyond what insurances or other coverage may handle.
Back in 2000, I had guessed on how much I would use and how it would be used....then came to realize $600 sitting there to be lost. It’s a terrible waste of financial planning with no real incentives.
If they said it could sit in a savings account, up to age 65 (or whenever you start social security), we’d all be better off.
There are different types of plans offered by employers. A Flexible Spending Account (FSA) which is sometimes called a Health Care Spending Account (HCSA) is a “use it or lose it” plan. But the HSA is different, it’s an account you fund tax deferred and any balance just rolls over from year to year so I don’t think it can be lost if you don’t spend it in a given year. You can also invest this tax deferred money that is sitting in your HSA in various mtutual funds offered by the plan, so it’s tax free and it grows (you hope!). I’m using it to stash money for retirement medical expenses which are at least 15 years away so it’s invested in some mutual funds (stock + bonds).
I think the bank she went to work for is selling high-deductible insurance plans along with the HSA products.
FSA’s will let you carry over a piddly limited amount now ($550, if I’m not mistaken) but even with some tax advantages. I am thinking about dropping the FSA next year and putting everything into the HSA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.