Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Would the New York Times Embrace Racism?
Vanity | 8//4/2018 | Self

Posted on 08/04/2018 10:40:40 AM PDT by CptnObvious

Why Would the New York Times Embrace Racism with Sarah Jeong when they're attacking Donald Trump for it. Can any of you tell me why??


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: chat; liberalmedia; nyt; racism; sarahjeong; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 08/04/2018 10:40:40 AM PDT by CptnObvious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

I think they’re so overwhelmed with hate and rage, they are essentially going insane.

It comes straight from the pits of hell.


2 posted on 08/04/2018 10:43:39 AM PDT by Paulie (America without Christ is like a Chemistry book without the periodic table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

for a long time now, liberals have thought that anti-white racism is just fine. They have determined that whites deserve scorn and hatred heaped upon them, and even violence is fine when directed at whites. So, their hiring this woman doesn’t surprise me any, I believe that they hired her BECAUSE of her outspoken anti-white racism, not in spite of it.


3 posted on 08/04/2018 10:43:49 AM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

Because they are going to bring up the textbook definition as to explain it to us cavemen.

See, you can’t be racist unless you are white, because racism is systemically ingrained...and only whites benefit from it in societal power structure.


4 posted on 08/04/2018 10:44:02 AM PDT by 1_Inch_Group (Country Before Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

Because its only racism when white men do it. (That’s sarcasm from me, but when they say it, they are dead serious!)


5 posted on 08/04/2018 10:44:04 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Asking a pro athlete for political advice is like asking a cavalry horse for tactical advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

Actual racism has nothing to do with it. Racism is merely an emotion laden word to sling at Them. It has no meaning beyond Bad and Evil and Not us. It is the same with all the other epithets used by leftists. Words’ definitions are entirely the emotional weight they carry. Every time a conservative denies being one of those things he is proving that the words affect him and that he IS what those words mean i.e. not “One of Us.”


6 posted on 08/04/2018 10:44:29 AM PDT by arthurus (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

Because they have always been racist. It just the groups they favored have changed but it’s still all about power..


7 posted on 08/04/2018 10:44:35 AM PDT by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious
They have all gone insane. It's like a zombie apocalypse


8 posted on 08/04/2018 10:44:53 AM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

Hating Whitey isn’t “racism” to the liberal mind......it’s an obligation.


9 posted on 08/04/2018 10:44:54 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious
Why Would the New York Times Embrace Racism?

Is this a trick question?

The NYT is run by Democrats and Liberals. They have been pro-slavery for as long as I have been alive.

Racism isn't that far along the continuum.

10 posted on 08/04/2018 10:46:13 AM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious
Why Would the New York Times Embrace Racism?

Is this a trick question?

The NYT is run by Democrats and Liberals. They have been pro-slavery for as long as I have been alive.

Racism isn't that far along the continuum.

11 posted on 08/04/2018 10:46:13 AM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

She’s nothing new for the NYT, it’s just that due to Twitter she has an easily-accessible (for now) public record of racism. I highly doubt that anyone on the editorial board there finds anything she had to say objectionable, despite their noisy protestation to the contrary.


12 posted on 08/04/2018 10:48:28 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

Desparation?
They think hating is a winning issue, I mean, the Left has nothing to offer but hate.


13 posted on 08/04/2018 10:48:36 AM PDT by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious
The left is smart to choose an enemy who doesn’t fight back.
14 posted on 08/04/2018 10:50:22 AM PDT by coaster123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

Not only racism. Misandry and anti-police.


15 posted on 08/04/2018 10:50:36 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

They actually believe Trump won on hate so, they believe they can too.
Trump did not win on hate, he won on MAGA.
He will do it again too.


16 posted on 08/04/2018 10:51:05 AM PDT by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right way right
Desperation?

Yes, I think so. Hemorrhaging losses of readers and advertisers has seriously chad them cut back staff repeatedly. I think you are right; Desperation is it.

17 posted on 08/04/2018 10:51:57 AM PDT by CptnObvious (Question her now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

Leftards are the living embodiment of hypocrisy. A striking element of that hypocrisy is racism - leftards are typically the most openly racist people you’ll ever meet. All while accusing you of the very thing they celebrate.

“Liberalism is a mental disorder”


18 posted on 08/04/2018 10:51:58 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

Because white males are subhuman, lower than animals, so it’s not racism.


19 posted on 08/04/2018 10:52:25 AM PDT by JPJones (More tariffs, less income tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CptnObvious

If one substitutes “Kulak” for “white,” the rationale becomes more clear. We’re dealing with a political movement, of people (leftists) who are experts in weaponizing language.


20 posted on 08/04/2018 10:55:09 AM PDT by VR-21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson