Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RWGinger

>>I know the current Big E is decommissioned and the next one is due to be launched in 2025?
so your idea makes sense
Unless the cost of keeping it operational is just too prohibitive<<

I was told by people here at FR who know these things that Big E had to be scrapped because the nuclear facility is integrated into the hull and to remove the nuke makes her unable to float.

Did I misunderstand?


8 posted on 10/09/2018 10:22:15 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Always believe women except: clinton rape, ellison assault, booker groping, ted kennedy murder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

I’ve heard the same thing also. Something to do whether where the tractors and associated “hot” components are makes it impossible to keep afloat. IIRC they were supposed save the tower.


48 posted on 10/09/2018 2:34:34 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson