Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not all the Earth’s Water Came From Comets
Universe Today ^ | 11/9/18 | Evan Gough

Posted on 11/10/2018 10:32:24 AM PST by LibWhacker

Not all the Earth’s Water Came From Comets

We have comets and asteroids to thank for Earth’s water, according to the most widely-held theory among scientists. But it’s not that cut-and-dried. It’s still a bit of a mystery, and a new study suggests that not all of Earth’s water was delivered to our planet that way.

Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, and it’s at the center of the question surrounding Earth’s water. This new study was co-led by Peter Buseck, Regents’ Professor in the School of Earth and Space Exploration and School of Molecular Sciences at Arizona State University. In it, the authors suggest that the hydrogen came, at least partially, from the solar nebula, a cloud of gas and dust left over after the Sun formed.

Before we dig in to the details in this new study, it’s helpful to look at the long-held theory that it may replace.

Earth’s Water: The Widely-Held Theory

For a long time, most scientists believed the water-from-comets-and asteroids version of water’s origin here on Earth. It all starts with the formation of the Sun.

When the Sun formed out of a molecular cloud, it swept up most of the material in the cloud, leaving a little left over for everything else: planets, asteroids, and comets. Once the Sun burst into life with fusion, a powerful solar wind sent a lot of hydrogen from its outer layers out beyond where the inner rocky planets—Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars—are today.

This is the realm of the gas giants, and more importantly, comets and asteroids. Comets are icy, rocky bodies, thought to contain significant amounts of the hydrogen blown out there by the early Sun, and asteroids too, although to a lesser extent. They became a significant reservoir for hydrogen.

An artist’s conception of the dust and gas surrounding a newly formed planetary system. Somewhere in there is Earth's water. Credit: NASAAn artist’s conception of the dust and gas surrounding a newly formed planetary system. Somewhere in there is Earth’s water. Credit: NASA

When Earth formed, it was a molten ball, its surface kept in that state by repeated collision with asteroids. So far, so good, since the early Solar System was a much more chaotic place than it is now. As asteroids and comets struck this hot Earth, the water and the hydrogen in it were boiled off into space. As the Earth cooled over time, water from comet and asteroid collisions was allowed to condense on Earth, and not be boiled off into space. The water stuck around.

The evidence for this lies in isotope ratios. The ratio of the heavy hydrogen isotope deuterium to normal hydrogen is a chemical signature. Two bodies of water with the same ratio must have the same origin, the thinking goes. And Earth’s oceans have the same ratio as water on asteroids.

That’s a very simplified version of the widely-held theory of how water got to Earth.

Earth’s Water: A Leaky Theory With Holes In It

But scientists are malcontents, always trying to have a better, more thorough understanding of things. They were questioning the “water from comets” theory before this newest study came out.

Back in 2014, some scientists studied the issue by looking at meteorites of different ages. (Meteorites are just asteroids that have struck Earth.) First they looked at what are known as ‘carbonaceous chondrite meteorites’. They’re the oldest ones we know of, and they formed about the same time as the Sun did. They’re the primary building blocks of Earth.

Next, they studied meteorites that we think originated from the large asteroid Vesta. Vesta formed in the same region as Earth, about 14 million years after the solar system was born. According to this 2014 study, the ancient meteorites resembled the bulk Solar System composition and have a lot of water in them, so they’ve been widely considered to be the source of Earth’s water.

The asteroid Vesta, courtesy of NASA's Dawn spacecraft. Meteorites ejected from Vesta may have helped form Earth's water. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCAL/MPS/DLR/IDA The asteroid Vesta, courtesy of NASA’s Dawn spacecraft. Meteorites ejected from Vesta may have helped form Earth’s water. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCAL/MPS/DLR/IDA

The measurements in this 2014 study showed that these meteorites have the same chemistry as the carbonaceous chondrites and rocks found on Earth. They concluded that carbonaceous chondrites are the most likely common source of water. At the time, Horst Marschall, one of the authors of the study, said, “The study shows that Earth’s water most likely accreted at the same time as the rock. The planet formed as a wet planet with water on the surface.” The team behind that study acknowledged that some of our water did come from impacts.

Which brings us to this new study, which reinforces the conclusions from the 2014 study.

Earth’s Water: All About The Hydrogen

The authors of this new study say that the oceans and their isotope ratios may not tell the whole story. “It’s a bit of a blind spot in the community,” said Steven Desch, a professor of astrophysics in the School of Earth and Space Exploration at Arizona State University in Tempe, Arizona. “When people measure the [deuterium-to-hydrogen] ratio in ocean water and they see that it is pretty close to what we see in asteroids, it was always easy to believe it all came from asteroids.” It’s hard to blame them; it’s a pretty compelling piece of evidence.

“It’s a bit of a blind spot in the community.” – Steven Desch, School of Earth and Space Exploration, ASU.

Desch and the other authors of this new study point to research published in 2015 showing that the Earth’s oceans may not be representative of Earth’s primordial water. The oceans may have cycled between the surface and a deeper reservoir of water, deep in the Earth. This may have changed the ratio over time, and it may mean that this deeper water represents at least some of Earth’s true primordial water. And that water may have come directly from the solar nebula, rather than through comet and asteroid impacts.A hydrogen atom is made up of one proton and one electron, but its heavy form, called deuterium, also contains a neutron.  Credit: NASA/GFSCA hydrogen atom is made up of one proton and one electron, but its heavy form, called deuterium, also contains a neutron. Credit: NASA/GFSC

The study develops a new theoretical model of Earth’s formation to explain these differences between hydrogen in Earth’s oceans and at the core-mantle boundary.

This new model shows large water-logged asteroids formed into planets billions of years ago in the solar nebula swirling around the Sun. These planetary embryos suffered sequential collision and they grew quickly. Eventually, they say, a powerful enough collision melted the surface of the largest embryo into an ocean of magma. This largest embryo became Earth.

This large embryo had enough gravity to hold onto an atmosphere, and it attracted gases, including hydrogen, the most abundant one, from the solar nebula to form one. The hydrogen in the solar nebula contained less deuterium and is lighter than asteroidal hydrogen. It dissolved into the molten iron of the magma ocean on Earth.

The hydrogen was pulled to the center of the Earth by a process called isotopic fractionation. Hydrogen is attracted to iron and was delivered the Earth’s core by the iron. Deuterium, the heavy hydrogen isotope, remained in the magma, which cooled to form the Earth’s mantle. Continuing impacts brought more water and mass to Earth, until it reached the mass it is today.

The key point in this new model is that hydrogen in the Earth’s core is different than hydrogen in the mantle and in the oceans. Core water has much less deuterium. But what does it all mean?

The new model allowed the authors to estimate the amounts of water that came from asteroid impacts as Earth grew and evolved, compared to how much came from the solar nebula when the Earth formed. Their conclusion? “For every 100 molecules of Earth’s water, there are one or two coming from solar nebula,” said Jun Wu, assistant research professor in the School of Molecular Sciences and School of Earth and Space Exploration at Arizona State University and co-lead author of the study.

Conclusion: It’s About More Than Just Earth’s Water

This study is a new perspective on planetary formation, development, and on how early life could flourish on a young planet.

“This model suggests that the inevitable formation of water would likely occur on any sufficiently large rocky exoplanets in extrasolar systems. I think this is very exciting.” – Jun Wu, School of Molecular Sciences and School of Earth and Space Exploration at ASU, co-lead author.

Previously, we thought that the only planets that could have life on them would have to be in a solar system rich with water-bearing asteroids and comets. But that may not be the case. In other solar systems, not all Earth-like planets have access to asteroids loaded with water. The new study suggests any habitable exoplanets might have gotten water from the solar nebula in their system. Earth hides most of its water in its interior. Earth has roughly two ocean in its mantle, and 4 or 5 in its core. Exoplanets may be similar.

Artist’s impression of a massive asteroid belt in orbit around a star. Earth's water may not have all come from asteroids and comets, so maybe that's true for exoplanets. Credit: NASA-JPL / Caltech / T. Pyle (SSC)Artist’s impression of a massive asteroid belt in orbit around a star. Earth’s water may not have all come from asteroids and comets, so maybe that’s true for exoplanets. Credit: NASA-JPL / Caltech / T. Pyle (SSC)

“This model suggests that the inevitable formation of water would likely occur on any sufficiently large rocky exoplanets in extrasolar systems,” Wu said. “I think this is very exciting.”

There’s one cautionary point in this new model though, and that involves the hydrogen fractionation. It’s not well-understood how the deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio changes when the element dissolves in iron, which is at the center of this new model. It had to be estimated in this new study.

Overall, the new study fits in well with other research into Earth’s water. Once more work is done on hydrogen fractionation, the new model can be tested more rigorously.

Sources:



TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: deuterium; earth; hydrogen; louisafrank; louisbfrank; louisfrank; patrickhuyghe; smallcomets; thegreatflood; thewatersabove; water; yec; youngearth; youngearthcosmology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Fascinating take on Earth's water.

Any water originally on the planet must've boiled off during the Earth's molten period, right?

Well, that's the old theory...

1 posted on 11/10/2018 10:32:24 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Well, I don’t exactly know how our water got here, but this I do know, God made it and He put it here on our round planet. Exactly how He might have done this is a fascinating question, and I think it wonderful that our scientists are slowly, sometimes with missteps, unlocking the secrets of the universe.


2 posted on 11/10/2018 10:35:30 AM PST by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Presuming there was a molten period.


3 posted on 11/10/2018 10:41:09 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Occasional Cortex: “Most of it came from the tap.”


4 posted on 11/10/2018 10:41:38 AM PST by C210N (Republicans sign check fronts; 'Rats sign check backs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I don’t see how either theory explains the water/ice elswhere in the solar system such as on Jupiter’s moons Europa and Ganymede.


5 posted on 11/10/2018 10:42:04 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Well, does this means that the oceans are rising (assuming for a minute that they are) because of unseen comet strikes continuing even today?


6 posted on 11/10/2018 10:43:26 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

That theory never passed muster with me. Glad I’m not the only one.


7 posted on 11/10/2018 10:45:07 AM PST by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Any water originally on the planet must've boiled off during the Earth's molten period, right?

My understanding with that theory is that the planet would have required far longer to cool than appears to have been the actual case.

8 posted on 11/10/2018 10:45:16 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Comets consist of heavy water. Icy asteroids are more like regular H2O


9 posted on 11/10/2018 10:45:28 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Think


10 posted on 11/10/2018 10:48:09 AM PST by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: C210N

It came from Culligan comets.


11 posted on 11/10/2018 10:48:53 AM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Those bodies formed beyond the “snow line.” There was plenty of molecular water in those regions long enough to result in the amounts of water ice there.

In fairness, the cometary impact blue planet theory never felt right to me. I was happy to see this theory evolve.


12 posted on 11/10/2018 10:51:02 AM PST by Heavyrunner (Socialize this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Think

That's too hard.

13 posted on 11/10/2018 10:52:41 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Presuming there was a molten period.
Considering lava, it seems like you might say that the majority of the material inside the earth is molten today.

14 posted on 11/10/2018 10:53:46 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Hydrogen is the most abundant (75%) element in the universe and oxygen is the third-most abundant (1%).

http://periodictable.com/Properties/A/UniverseAbundance.html

Water us composed of hydrogen and oxygen.

Any questions?


15 posted on 11/10/2018 10:53:58 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Democracy dies when Democrats refuse to accept the result of a democratic election they didn't win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
We have comets and asteroids to thank for Earth’s water...

That seems like an awful lot of comets and asteroids....

16 posted on 11/10/2018 11:01:12 AM PST by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

“1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.”

We don’t need no steenking comet.


17 posted on 11/10/2018 11:02:09 AM PST by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
But scientists are malcontents, always trying to have a better, more thorough understanding of things.

Except for climate change. That's settled. /sarc

18 posted on 11/10/2018 11:02:54 AM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

No, due to the pressure within the mantle and even between the crust and the mantle. The asthenosphere, for example, is generally solid due to that pressure; it’s actually when the pressure goes down that molten magma can form, as I understand it.

Also, the planet’s outer core is liquid iron and nickel, but the inner core is solid; but the temperatures down there are as hot as the sun’s surface.


19 posted on 11/10/2018 11:06:52 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: erkelly

You said it faster than I could have. Just found this thread.


20 posted on 11/10/2018 11:33:28 AM PST by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson