Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Mars Is Hard': Tension Rises for NASA's InSight Landing on Red Planet
Space.com ^ | November 25, 2018 03:24pm ET | Mike Wall,

Posted on 11/25/2018 5:44:07 PM PST by BenLurkin

NASA's InSight Mars lander is scheduled to touch down on the Red Planet tomorrow afternoon (Nov. 26), and mission team members and agency officials are understandably nervous about the make-or-break moment.

The difficulty for landed missions stems chiefly from the fact that Mars features both a relatively strong gravitational pull and a wispy atmosphere, which is just 1 percent as thick as that of Earth, said Tom Hoffman, InSight project manager at JPL. So, approaching spacecraft get accelerated to high speeds and then have a hard time dissipating enough energy to slow down before landing, he explained during today's news conference.

InSight will hit the Martian atmosphere a little before 3 p.m. EST (2000 GMT) while traveling about 12,300 mph (19,800 km/h). The spacecraft must nail its target entry angle of 12 degrees precisely, team members have said: Any steeper, and InSight will burn up; any shallower, and the vehicle will bounce off the atmosphere and careen into space.

Atmospheric drag will eventually slow InSight down to about 840 mph (1,350 km/h), and then the craft will deploy its supersonic parachute, Hoffman said. Shortly before touchdown, InSight will fire up its retrorockets, allowing it to settle onto the red dirt at just 5 mph (8 km/h)

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; insight; mars; marsinsight; science

1 posted on 11/25/2018 5:44:07 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I bet there’s a lot of coffee being consumed at Mission Control.


2 posted on 11/25/2018 5:58:51 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It takes 25 min for a command signal to reach Mars. Makes a correct shot that much harder.


3 posted on 11/25/2018 6:25:18 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
InSIght. $828+ Million plus ground support costs.

Because: "The instrument redesign and two-year delay add $153.8 million" to the $675 million mission cost, NASA said in a statement. "The additional cost will not delay or cancel any current missions, though there may be fewer opportunities for new missions in future years, from fiscal years 2017-2020," it added."

All this to drill a hole 16 feet deep.

Put another way, $4.3 million per inch.

Of course if they crater the probe, all bets are off. No way to get any data out of that hole...

Ya, not a supporter of the 'new' NASA'. Not even a little.

4 posted on 11/25/2018 7:54:10 PM PST by ASOC (Having humility really means one is rarely humiliated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

*ping*


5 posted on 11/25/2018 8:28:39 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

LOL!
is Viagra a NASA sponsor now?


6 posted on 11/25/2018 8:31:07 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Such a waste.


7 posted on 11/25/2018 8:41:36 PM PST by taxesareforever (Islam is an ideology. It is NOT a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

Yes yes but its going to sit one that hole for 24 months - see ...


8 posted on 11/26/2018 12:32:39 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lurk
It takes 25 min for a command signal to reach Mars. Makes a correct shot that much harder.

According to the article, it is currently around 7 minutes.

9 posted on 11/26/2018 12:47:34 AM PST by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EVO X

Thanks for the correction. I should have double checked.


10 posted on 11/26/2018 6:36:52 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lurk; All

You are welcome. Touchdown is suppose to be 2:54 EST and NASA should receive a beep from the lander at 3:01 EST.


11 posted on 11/26/2018 8:38:24 AM PST by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
Such a waste.

Disagree 100%. Extremely difficult, cutting edge scientific research or exploration is one of the few things that government should do for the nation.

The more difficult to accomplish, the larger the potential benefit the nation receives.

12 posted on 11/26/2018 8:50:30 AM PST by TruthFactor (Hang em', Hang em' High.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EVO X; All
Touchdown is suppose to be 2:54 EST and NASA should receive a beep from the lander at 3:01 EST.

The NASA web page got the above report wrong. Touchdown was confirmed at 2:54 EST which means it actually landed at 2:47 EST..

13 posted on 11/26/2018 12:03:18 PM PST by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson