Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dissident intellectual Noam Chomsky at 90
DW ^ | 12/7/2018

Posted on 12/07/2018 8:27:25 AM PST by Borges

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: Borges

Cannot last too much longer.....


21 posted on 12/07/2018 8:47:49 AM PST by B.O. Plenty (Give war a chance....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Cannot last too much longer.....


22 posted on 12/07/2018 8:47:49 AM PST by B.O. Plenty (Give war a chance....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

For a man to write about propaganda speech and how to recognized it, he sure won’t call out the BS in todays media...


23 posted on 12/07/2018 8:51:39 AM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

His birthday is Pearl Harbor Day.

Irony: The Mark of Quality Literature.


24 posted on 12/07/2018 8:52:18 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Orwell would punch you in the face if you called him a socialist.


25 posted on 12/07/2018 8:54:58 AM PST by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

In Tom Wolfe’s “The Kingdom of Speech”, he discusses Chomsky’s work in the field of linguistics. Chomsky is basically regarded as the Einstein of linguistics, and much of his work stands the test of time, sort of.

For example, his theory that all human language on earth has a common thread, in that it uses recursion (I’m not smart enough to fully explain what recursion means, but it’s basically parenthetical references built into the language). For years, this theory was proven correctly, from the most obscure language in remote New Guinea to the major familiar world languages.

Then one missionary found a very remote group of South American natives who spoke a language that absolutely did not include recursion. This guy was excoriated for daring to challenge Chomsky. He wasn’t being a gadfly, he was just reporting what he observed. So the elite linguists went down there to prove him wrong. Surely he must be mistaken. Well guess what, they found zero recursion in this unique language. Chomsky was fit to be tied, and smeared this guy in academic circles.

I don’t think too highly of old Noam after reading this. Wolfe is a pretty fair author who researches everything to the hilt. Interesting deconstruction of a linguist’s theory, and the scientific method biting the dust in the service of Chomsky’s massive ego.


26 posted on 12/07/2018 8:55:07 AM PST by scottinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Only the good die young...


27 posted on 12/07/2018 8:57:56 AM PST by pgkdan (The Silent Majority STILL Stands With TRUMP! WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Despite such controversies, Chomsky has remained one of the world's foremost public intellectuals throughout his eighties, a tireless advocates for peace (lately in Yemen), human rights, economic equality and climate justice via constant public speaking and media appearances.

Sure, because nothing illustrates one's firm commitment to peace and human rights like supporting and helping to whitewash the bloody history of regimes like the Khmer Rouge.

Though the dissident intellectual has been a fierce opponent of US imperialism under both major political parties in America, in 2017 he called the Republican Party "the most dangerous organization in human history" for its consistent rejection of the science of climate change.

"Has there ever been an organization in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organized human life on Earth?”

How ironic, coming from a rabid leftist whose entire philosophy is based on rejection of science, reason and logic, who no doubt would be thrilled at some catastrophic event that causes millions of deaths.

I've heard Noam Chomsky speak; he says many words but does not convey any ideas. I think he chooses words that people interpret emotionally, even as his sentences are devoid of meaning. Not long ago, I read about a study that examined how people respond to a non-sensical sentence. The truly intelligent people immediately recognized the test sentence as nonsense. The not-so-intelligent people thought the test sentence was profound and meaningful. Based on this study and given that Chomsky typically utters meaningless strings of words, I think we can make some assumptions about the intellect of those who admire Chomsky.

Anyways, I must agree with the people who posted above who expressed disappointment that this article is not an obit. I know it is wrong to hope for someone to pass, but...

28 posted on 12/07/2018 9:00:31 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan; All

cunning: “having or showing skill in achieving one’s ends by deceit or evasion”

So, a cunning linguist


29 posted on 12/07/2018 9:01:45 AM PST by raccoonradio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Pearl Harbor occurred on his Bar Mitzvah...


30 posted on 12/07/2018 9:05:12 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Good riddance to bad rubbish.

L


31 posted on 12/07/2018 9:05:42 AM PST by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

The treacle oozes from this paean.


32 posted on 12/07/2018 9:06:27 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scottinoc

There is no ONE common thread to all of the languages. There are distinct branches to the language tree. Proto IndoEuropean being only one. We now have super computers that may find things yet undiscovered but there are after all only so many sounds the tongue can make so there will be some incidental overlap.


33 posted on 12/07/2018 9:06:59 AM PST by BipolarBob (Have a McClane Christmas : "Now I have a machine gun HO-HO - HO".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Da Chump is still alive? I didn’t know that.


34 posted on 12/07/2018 9:07:08 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (#NotARussianBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

From the headline I thought this was going to be an obituary.
Other than that disappointment, it’s turning out to be a nice day.


35 posted on 12/07/2018 9:12:36 AM PST by I want the USA back (There are two sexes: male (pronoun HE), and female (pronoun SHE). Denial of this is insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
Chomsky is the idiot who hobbled the field of linqguistics with his ridiculous theory that grammar is innate (no evidence), and that grammar doesn't matter (patently false). His sentence "colorless green ideas sleep furiously" is claimed by Chomsky to be grammatically correct and meaningless. It is not grammatically correct due to two color adjectives (there can only be one) and it is not meaningless as sleeping furiously has metaphoric meaning.

The bottom line with Chomsky is he is a leftist who lies like all leftists do. The words that spew from his mouth are evidence of very shallow leftist thinking. It's not much different than his work in linguistics, shallow, stupid, and ultimately counterproductive. Despite his imminent death, the damage is done.

36 posted on 12/07/2018 9:13:40 AM PST by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Noam Chomsky is a very brilliant and interesting man.

Have been on the polar opposite side of the spectrum from him for as long as I can remember, but I do respect the man.

If you go check, many of his insights are spot on even if his conclusions and solutions are from a leftist perspective and generally go in an ill advised direction.

Being a bit of a cynic, I also have never really been able to sort out how much of Chomsky is his real world view and how much is preaching a marketable message to a fanatical base that to who book sales has made him a very prominent, famous and wealthy socialist indeed.

At any rate, Chomsky is a free thinker who explicitly invites both his fans and his critics to read what he has to say, do their own research to come to their own independent conclusions and he is more than willing to engage in spirited debate when your conclusions diverge from his.

While I would not say he is totally intellectually honest, he does exhibit a sort of intellectual honor and civility that is sorely lacking in today's violent and un civil Left Wing Cultural Marxist Progressives

While I strongly disagree with the premise, conclusions and social remedies of Chomsky's misguided ( or, for the more cynical, the lucrative niche market Chomsky brand he he has cut out of the intellectual market place and which he markets his followers) world view, I am awed by the thought process and perspectives he uses to come to them .

His insights are brilliant and ironically, very relevant to the place we find ourselves today with our increasingly corrupt and tyrannical government.

Every Freeper owes it to him or herself to do a web search on notable Chomsky quotes and perspectives on government power.

37 posted on 12/07/2018 9:18:52 AM PST by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Hillary Clinton loves this puke.


38 posted on 12/07/2018 9:18:59 AM PST by laplata (The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
Yet while the darling of the global anti-imperialist left, Chomsky has faced sustained criticism for whitewashing the genocide committed by the communist Khmer Rouge in Cambodia.

Chomsky certainly faced no "sustained criticism" from the left for "whitewashing the genocide by the communist". If he was criticized by the left at all, it was quiet and with very limited publicity.

Is this puff-piece author otherwise trying to convey the impression the international left disapproved of the genocide in Cambodia (both AKA "community organizing" and "rewriting history")?

39 posted on 12/07/2018 9:27:08 AM PST by frog in a pot (Result of many state bailouts? Taxpayers elsewhere in America get to finance the Left's growth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Perfect dob for this treasonous piece of garbage.


40 posted on 12/07/2018 9:27:08 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson