Posted on 01/10/2019 2:16:37 PM PST by tjd1454
Preach it.
Are they male or female?
Why are you demanding an explanation of something from tjd1454 that even medical science has a hard time defining?
What is your point?
Are herms male or female? What are they? If there is only male and female, what are they?
My horse thinks he’s a bird.
Nearly every morning I tell him to get out of that tree.
God’s Design will survive.
Those who uphold God’s Design may not.
What’s your point?
My point is to learn something. I’m asking what they are. Male or female. FReepers know stuff. Since they share both traits, what are they classified as, or is there another gender.
Yes: arguing from the exception.
By that reasoning, an assembly-line engine defect that prevents one cylinder block from operating as an internal combustion engine means that internal combustion itself is a myth and that engine blocks exist on a nebulous continuum without any functional norm.
Yup, He did.
He created one man, Adam, and one woman, Eve, and from that one male and female couple the human race was brought forth. God did not create Adam and Eve as hermaphrodites.
What are hermaphrodites? God created them. Male, female?
Your question is nonsense.
By definition they are neither male nor female.
If you are going to classify them as male or female, they they are, by definition, not hermaphrodites.
Sure.....
Here. Read this.
Hermaphroditehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermaphrodite
Your patience is commendable.
Indeed Jim. Females have two XX chromosomes. Males have an X and a Y chromosome. Nothing on this Earth or in mans science can ever change that.
Ok, fine.
My understanding is:
They do not change actual sex, which is genetic; they change sexual function, which is an adaptation.
This does not happen naturally in humans. It happens unnaturally through exogenous hormone treatment. The rare instances in utero without external engineering are due to some unusual circumstance (e.g., excessive testosterone exposure at a key developmental stage); it manifestly is not just another human sexual result from insemination, producing some fluidly multifarious gamut of so-called genders. The exceptions are exceptions, not normal variations.
Some lower species have both organs partially developed; some change due to population dynamics through endogenous hormone secretion - or being exposed to the many xeno-estrogens humans are producing (resulting in quasi-females from actual males).
This phenomenon is used as propaganda to ostensibly prove the gender spectrum dogma.
It does not. It proves adaptation (versus evolution). It does not apply to humans, any more than reptilian oviparous (external egg laying) reproduction does.
Certain urban male frogs are turning “female” as a result of human artificial estrogenic fertilizers and pesticides.
These same artificial chemicals are indeed affecting human males: Sperm counts have been falling steadily since the introduction of such products into the environment after WWII. Think Soy [phyto-estrogenic] Boy on steroids - synthetic estrogenic steroids.
If they were classified as male or female, they wouldn’t be hermaphrodites.
Think through what you are asking cause your question is not logical.
Not female or male. That is illogical. male, female, and other?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.