Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA weighs shelving Boeing rocket, using other option for flight to moon
Seattle Times ^ | 03/13/2018 | Justin Bachman

Posted on 03/15/2019 2:19:14 PM PDT by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: SunkenCiv

So then they can go back to their mission of sending Mohammadans into outer space ?


41 posted on 03/16/2019 12:20:23 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: beef
Actually the truth is that "The one thing the ISS is teaching us is that the human body is not suitable for space travel" using current technology and methods.

The Orion Project (motto: Mars by 1965, Saturn by 1970 which was killed in 1964) got around those problems completely. However, there was not only a total failure of political will, but also the concept was politically incorrect. And so we are stuck using second rate technologies and methods to this day.

42 posted on 03/16/2019 3:43:06 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Nearly 300,000lbs into LEO. That’s a monster that dwarfs Saturn V.


no.

Saturn V 310,000 to LEO (90 nmi) or 170 nmi at 30 degrees, 107,100 to TLI


43 posted on 03/16/2019 3:49:34 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

What kind of heavy are we talking? Falcon Heavy can lift 64 tons.


44 posted on 03/16/2019 5:34:58 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The Red Queen wasn't kidding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PIF

“The Orion Project”

I think that was the one that was going to use nuclear bombs as propulsion. I can see doing that in space, and it has been proposed as a means to get to Proxima Centari. But the original Orion Project had them using nukes starting on the ground. Yes, I think that would be a political problem.

I saw an interesting video where they proposed to launch a massive number of micro probes which would weigh about a gram and have light sails ~1m x 1m. They would be propelled to 0.2C by a huge array of ground based lasers. Massive redundancy, get there in 20 years. Given the advances in electronic and micro machines, I can see this tech being developed.

One problem with a single big ship is that the kinetic energy of just a speck of dust at those speeds would be like a nuke going off. Paint flecks cracked windows on the space shuttle going at ~18000 miles per hour. At 0.1C you are going 18000 miles per second. Small and redundant is possible solution to this issue.

“using current technology and methods”
That’s where basic research comes in.


45 posted on 03/16/2019 7:20:45 AM PDT by beef (Caution: Potential Sarcasm - Process Accordingly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ozark Tom

I have had an MRI and I could definitely feel it when they switched it on. Maybe that’s a solution. This is where basic research come into play. I am amazed by how much conditioning you must get from just having gravity tugging at every molecule in your body 24x7.


46 posted on 03/16/2019 7:26:21 AM PDT by beef (Caution: Potential Sarcasm - Process Accordingly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: beef

Also any stationary atoms encounter at those speeds would end up with energies akin to a particle accelerator. In this case the particle isn’t be accelerated the target - the space is! If it hits moving atoms or particles just add those energies in!


47 posted on 03/16/2019 7:27:18 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Particles hitting something at huge speeds produce gamma rays. Another hazard. I read some years ago about a scheme to use magnetic fields to sweep the path clean. More mass, more energy required.


48 posted on 03/16/2019 7:45:01 AM PDT by beef (Caution: Potential Sarcasm - Process Accordingly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: beef

Yep!
If you could “warp space”, route the parties around the craft.

Sorry had to throw in some “Star Trek science” for fun!


49 posted on 03/16/2019 7:50:01 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: beef

It was only a political problem at the time because of the various treaties we had signed with Russian and the UN. The Limited Test Ban Treaty prevented it.

Yes, originally it was using nukes to launch, but was changed to using chemical rockets to orbit before it was canceled. One of the largest factors in cancellation was the Air Force which had other ideas like Apollo.

Collision is always a problem. However there were/are several schemes for overcoming this problem.

If you never try you never will.


50 posted on 03/16/2019 7:59:18 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Well, I suppose anything is possible. The kind of manned spaceflight that people really want requires us to build something like a USS Enterprise. We have absolutely no idea how to do that. That’s why I think that we need to set aside the foolishness we are engaged in today and use those resources to figure out how we might build that star ship. In the mean time, we can still be using the methods to explore the universe which have served us so well to this point


51 posted on 03/16/2019 8:05:14 AM PDT by beef (Caution: Potential Sarcasm - Process Accordingly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: PIF

I need to find that video I saw on traveling to Proxima Centari and link to it here. One of the options was a ship just over 1 km long. IIRC it would have 100,000 H bombs on board, and that would be sufficient to propel it to 0.1C. It would be pretty cool to watch it during the acceleration phase.


52 posted on 03/16/2019 8:24:38 AM PDT by beef (Caution: Potential Sarcasm - Process Accordingly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: beef
The crew was slated to be around 250,000. IIRC it would take only a decade or so to get there.

But all that was before zero point propulsion ...
Zero Point - Classified Anti Gravity Craft - UFO Full Documentary
Narrated by Mark McCandlish USAF illustrator.

Who is McCandlish?

Is the Mark McCandlish Alien Reproduction Vehicle Nothing More Than Project 1794? (a jet propelled vehicle)
See McCandlish's replies in comments section.

OT
Former Defense Industry Technician Makes His Voice Heard At Anti-Geoengineering Event (Mark McCandlish)
... exposing and halting global climate engineering programs that are decimating our planet and the entire web of life

53 posted on 03/16/2019 8:51:12 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson