Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Illinois governor announces plan to legalize marijuana
Associated Press ^ | May 4, 2019 | Sara Burnett

Posted on 05/04/2019 7:12:32 PM PDT by Olog-hai

Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker said Saturday he’s reached an agreement with key lawmakers on a plan to legalize recreational marijuana in the state starting next year.

The legislation would allow adults 21 and older to legally buy cannabis for recreational use from licensed dispensaries. Illinois residents could possess up to about an ounce (30 grams) of marijuana, while non-residents could possess about half an ounce (15 grams).

The measure also would automatically expunge some marijuana convictions.

If it passes, Illinois would join 10 other states, including neighboring Michigan, in legalizing recreational marijuana. While the Illinois law would take effect Jan. 1, the first licenses for Illinois growers, processors and dispensaries wouldn’t be issued until May and July 2020, the governor’s office said.

Pritzker was joined by fellow Democratic lawmakers in Chicago to announce the deal, which comes after years of discussion among state legislators. They said the measure will be introduced Monday, kicking off debate at the Legislature, where Democrats hold a majority in both chambers. …

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Food; Health/Medicine; Local News; Society
KEYWORDS: cannabis; illinois; legalization; marijuana; pot; pritzker; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: The Antiyuppie
with pot, there isn’t any clear/legal definition of what “under the influence” is.

Wrong - several legalizing states have set blood concentration limits on THC just as is done with alcohol.

21 posted on 05/04/2019 8:44:03 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; Impy; BillyBoy; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; LS; campaignPete R-CT; dp0622; Clemenza; ...

Prickzer goes full doper retard, film at 11.


22 posted on 05/04/2019 8:47:13 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (BUTTGIGGITY ! It's an anal thing. You wouldn't understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
Then lets bring back alcohol prohibition. That worked out just great.

There is a big difference between alcohol prohibition---where alcohol was already allowed and THEN prohibited---to making marijuana legal---a substance not yet legal.

23 posted on 05/04/2019 8:49:41 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

MJ and other drugs had previously been legal


24 posted on 05/04/2019 8:52:15 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree
There's also the reason that it's nobody's business if an adult drinks alcohol or smokes pot.

Sure there is--when you are operating a multi-ton motor vehicle outside of your home, separated from other vehicles by mere feet, you have no business being under the influence of anything. Or when you are operating on a surgical patient, operating dangerous machinery, etc. I don't care if you want to kill your own brain cells and dope or drink yourself into oblivion--in your own house. But don't you dare bring that lack of perfect sharpness into the lane next to mine or into an operating room or a manufacturing facility.

25 posted on 05/04/2019 8:52:28 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

Marijuana was legal up until 1914.


26 posted on 05/04/2019 8:55:34 PM PDT by jmacusa ("The more numerous the laws the more corrupt the government''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC
Sure there is--when you are operating a multi-ton motor vehicle outside of your home, separated from other vehicles by mere feet, you have no business being under the influence of anything. Or when you are operating on a surgical patient, operating dangerous machinery, etc.

Of course - but if that's not reason enough to ban alcohol, it's not reason enough to ban pot.

27 posted on 05/04/2019 9:00:08 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

“Wrong - several legalizing states have set blood concentration limits on THC just as is done with alcohol.”

They had to come up with SOME kind of a number; those numbers are still very controversial. BAC has been examined for 80 years. And testing for THC isn’t as simple as blowing into a machine. If the popo are going to draw blood at every traffic stop then we are in a great deal of trouble. There are not quite perfected THC breath analyzers but who knows how that will play out.


28 posted on 05/04/2019 9:23:57 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

BUILD THE WALL (!) between Chicago and Gary.

Build a wall around Chicago, period!

29 posted on 05/04/2019 10:10:30 PM PDT by BlessedBeGod (To restore all things in Christ~~Appeasing evil is cowardice~~Francis is temporary. Hell is forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Shiny object for the masses to swim after while the state swirls down the bowl. And, still illegal under federal law. Wouldn’t it be funny to watch all these people who set up their giant distribution centers, only to watch the feds drop by and confiscate all their pot and assets?


30 posted on 05/05/2019 4:21:38 AM PDT by mikefive (RLTW/DOL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC
It's the money and they're happy to have a dumbed down, dependent electorate.
31 posted on 05/05/2019 4:35:27 AM PDT by Vision (Obama corrupted, sought to weaken and fundamentally change America; he didn't plan on being stopped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie
They had to come up with SOME kind of a number; those numbers are still very controversial.

How is this controversy relevant to the legalization question?

If the popo are going to draw blood at every traffic stop

Chicken Little-ism - they don't administer an alcohol breathalyzer at every traffic stop.

32 posted on 05/05/2019 6:31:23 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mikefive
Wouldn’t it be funny to watch all these people who set up their giant distribution centers, only to watch the feds drop by and confiscate all their pot and assets?

It would be a gross violation of the Tenth Amendment - one for which our President has shown no appetite.

33 posted on 05/05/2019 6:32:46 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
1937, actually.
34 posted on 05/05/2019 6:33:24 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Just another day in a crumbling civilization...


35 posted on 05/05/2019 6:52:29 AM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also. Wall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree
Yes, I realized that after I posted. Thank you Harry Anslinger. And “Reefer Madness’’, that God awful propaganda film that had a lot to do with the governments decision.
36 posted on 05/05/2019 7:10:15 AM PDT by jmacusa ("The more numerous the laws the more corrupt the government''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

I hate stupid laws, and laws with stupid stipulations. Ok, we’re gonna legalize pot. But only THIS much, and only HALF that much if you’re from out of state. Let’s do this with beer; a twelve-pack is ok to have in your fridge, but not three six-packs!

I hope the feds arrest our current governor for the tax fraud rap. What a moron.

If they could’ve built a wall around Chicago, to keep people IN, it might’ve saved their soda tax lol.


37 posted on 05/05/2019 7:25:21 AM PDT by Nabron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Meanwhile Colorado reports quite honestly that DUI for marijuana is on a big increase there. There was/is apparently more pot heads than casual users than everyone thought, or the number of pot heads increased as casual use became legal. I suspect it was the latter.


38 posted on 05/05/2019 7:38:18 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

More potheads. More people dependent on gov’t services as they will not be able to hold a steady job.


39 posted on 05/05/2019 8:02:13 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
Meanwhile Colorado reports quite honestly that DUI for marijuana is on a big increase there.

Sounds like urban legend to me. Link?

40 posted on 05/05/2019 12:57:28 PM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson