Posted on 07/07/2020 11:57:28 AM PDT by rickmichaels
The Human Rights Campaign (HRC) effectively erased biological facts in its latest “Transgender Safer Sex” guide, redefining basic body parts and assigning “vagina” as a term used to describe the genitals of biological males who “have had bottom surgery.”
The HRC, in a “safer sex guide for transgender and gender expansive people,” redefined basic biological body parts under the guise of inclusivity, effectively stripping females of their own biology and assigning it to biological males.
The group’s blunt guide provided a list of words and provided its own definitions — definitions that do not coincide with biological fact. For instance, HRC defined “vagina” as a word used to “talk about the genitals of trans women who have had bottom surgery.” Yet, the HRC refused to use the same term for biological women, assigning them the term “front hole.” Similarly, HRC also redefined male genitalia, proclaiming that it could “belong to people of all genders.”
Definitions, per the guide, are as follows:
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I don’t get this. About six months ago, I heard we were supposed to refer to the “front hole” is describing what transsexual people got going on down there. And the reasoning was that we don’t want to use terms which have traditionally been associated with one sex or the other.
I was just getting used to the front hole, now I have to change my thinking again?????
I need to go to re-education camp. I will be sent there eventually, if these far leftist types who come up with this stuff ever achieve the power to ship people away.
HRC? Well, isn’t that acronym a coincidence.
Human Rights Campaign is homofascist and anti-Christan.
I. Am. So. Sick. Of. This. S- !
If we don't re elect President Trump, a lot of us will never make it to a re-ed camp. 
oh, no kidding! I was thinking “what the hell does she have to do with this nonsense?”
hrc is so out of touch
bottom surgery is not accurate
its front hole surgery
oh yeah, we have to say this now here, /sarc
Sounds like the same wackos who came up with the terms “front hole,” “front pole,” and others.
“have had bottom surgery.” ? “front hole.” ?
Not that it matters, I was just wondering why you changed the word vagina to va*ina in the title?
Democrats want to bring Islamic Iranian laws to the United States. In Iran, homosexuals are forced to have sexual reassignment surgery to comply with the Islamic Law. They turn homosexual men into post opt transsexuals and declare them as women and they live as women. Same for women who are lesbians. They give them sexual reassignment surgery. Democrats want that here
“The Human Rights Campaign is the largest LGBTQ advocacy group and political lobbying organization in the United States.”
They forgot the full acronym:
LGBTQFUBAR
I posted two threads in the past week that were taken down for what the mods described as “profanity,” although I thought the terms used in the articles posted were inoffensive. But my opinion doesn’t count, of course. I wasn’t taking the chance this time.
It’s the Latin word for “sheath.”
Possibly more vulgar than cunnus in ancient Rome.
The blind leading the blind into a ditch.
Liberal men take over women’s issues just as white liberals take over black issues. To paraphrase Agent Smith, I have figured out what liberals are; they are locusts.
Wow, I am surprised to learn we have politically correct moderators here on a Conservative Site. Especially when vagina is used to describe an anatomical organ.
Was the word vagina in the article you posted that was taken down for “profanity”? I know many profane words I just didn’t believe FR would ever ban the words like penis and vagina. We are not 3rd graders posting here after all.
If such is the case, when it comes time to make my next anunal donation of a dollar a day I might take pause to reconsider.
Please help me out here with the specific word you used that made you think vagina was a profane term.
Not exactly true. His pulled articles (3) all had some form of eff in the title. Not cool, masked or not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.