More Ann Coulter Pictures

Fox News | 2003/02/06 | Keith White

[ktw]

http://65.16.168.162/misc/index.htm

[ktw]

More Ann Pictures

[Henchster]

Yeah, like...WHERE????

OK, to bail your @$$ out, here's a HOT one of Ann....

[dasboot]

mighforgble mumph s eeeeka homminnahomminna!!!!!!!!!!!!
My Fave!!

[chnsmok]

I think she should be forever be known as "Ann as quoted on the floor of the US Senate on 2/05/2003". Okay, with pic. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/836709/posts?page=33#33

[Tall_Texan]

You might have had better luck if you had found a moment where her lips weren't moving...

[ktw]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Bob]

Numeric URLs scare some people off. You never know what porn site you might be linking to. I'd suggest posting the URL using the name of the site rather than its IP address.

Sorry but, if you hadn't been a Freeper for so long, I would have assumed this was a troll post.

[MrJingles]

She looks like she's put some weight on. She looks good.

[Bob]

Sorry, I just realized that you had posted these on your own site. If you're on cable modem with a personal account, you should be sure to check your user's agreement to make sure that you can use your service to act as a server. Some restrictions do apply depending on your provider.

[Swordmaker]

GentleFreepers,

It is an unwritten rule of FreeRepublic (and probably of conservatives everywhere) that articles by Ann Coulter must have obligatory photos of Ann.

However, we do not want people to think that it is merely Ann's great looks that attract us to her. (After all there are at least a few good-looking bubble-headed Liberal gals out there, although I would not want to have a conversation with one.)

By merely posting pictures of Ann, we run the risk of being accused of being attracted to her for purely purient reasons... and we do not want to be in the position of trying to make lame explainations that it is not just physical attraction... sort of like the people who buy Playboy magazine insist it is for the articles and not for the centerfold... but that we are REALLY interested in her mind. If we just post pictures, we are left drooling with no legitimate excuse for the dumbfounded looks on our faces.

Therefor, I hereby propose another unwritten rule (please ignore that I am writing this rule down) that all pictures of Ann must be accompanied by an obligatory article written by Ann. If we adhere to this simple requirement, we can look at Ann all we like and not have to make lame excuses.

Thank you.

[Swordmaker]

Er, pardon me... DROOL.

[Bob]

By merely posting pictures of Ann, we run the risk of being accused of being attracted to her for purely purient reasons...

You mean -- we're NOT???? Sorry, you're right -- we're not.

We're definitely not attracted to her for prurient reasons. Yep, that's my story and I'm stickin' to it. :=)

[A CA Guy]

Intelligent, sassy and beautiful. You can sign me up for her admiration society anytime.

[Lancey Howard]

"After all there are at least a few good-looking bubble-headed Liberal gals out there"

Okay. Sure, there's Helen Thomas, Molly Ivins, and Eleanor Clift.... but after that, who can you name?

[WSGilcrest]

Buy that girl a hamburger.

[Henchster]

Now THAT'S what I'm talkin' 'bout!

WOO-HOO! Thank YOU!

[Henchster]

Get in line dude, I've been droolin' for years! {;^)

[Hank Rearden]

That woman seriously needs a couple of decent meals, instead of just half a head of lettuce and a pack of cigarettes.

[djf]

You could always marry her.

That would plump her up pretty quick, eh?
:-}

[fella]

Hubba, Hubba, .... AWOoooooooooooo!