Skip to comments.
Michigan Miscellany (Rand Paul Polling First In Michigan)
Public Policy Polling ^
| 04-09-2014
| Tom Jensen
Posted on 04/09/2014 1:17:09 PM PDT by PaulCruz2016
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Paul: 16%
Christie: 15%
Huckabee: 15%
Cruz: 11%
Bush: 9%
Ryan: 5%
Walker: 5%
Rubio: 4%
Jindal: 3%
Not sure: 17%
To: PaulCruz2016
Huckabee? Jebbie Bush? Ron Paul, Junior? Hahahahahaha! Is this from Scott Ott?
2
posted on
04/09/2014 1:21:10 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(I will raise $2M for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
To: Springman; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; madison10; ...
3
posted on
04/09/2014 1:21:35 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: PaulCruz2016
This is about 2016? Seriously?
Does anybody remember why Clinton was the nominee for the D’s in 1992? It’s because Bush Sr. was so high in his approval ratings that any “qualified” democrats decided to wait for a cycle more friendly to their party. Which left them with the unknown from Arkansas.
And then Bush’s numbers went down.
IOW, who gets what now is beyond irrelevant. It’s comical that anyone would even bother to check.
To: PaulCruz2016
To: PaulCruz2016
Gosh it sure looks like Mrs. Clinton would win big if she runs. Gosh we sure don’t want her to run. You can do anything just don’t run HilLIARy Clinton against us~!
6
posted on
04/09/2014 1:24:37 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
(If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period. PALIN/CRUZ 2016)
To: PaulCruz2016
This sort of a poll, 2 1/2 years before an election, is almost totally meaningless. As I recall, even 8 months before the 1992 election, Bush Senior looked virtually unbeatable. Then Clinton surged & won.
It only takes a few weeks of a really well run campaign, to create a virtual tidal wave of public sentiment. Of course if the Republican candidate allows Karl Rove any major role in the campaign, Hillary might actually get elected. Remember, my reference is to a "really well run campaign," not a suicidal exercise in stupidity.
William Flax
7
posted on
04/09/2014 1:26:13 PM PDT
by
Ohioan
To: BarnacleCenturion
Win Michigan? Maybe. But for real conservatives.... Not a chance.
8
posted on
04/09/2014 1:28:15 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: PaulCruz2016
Rand is following in his father’s footsteps. All zizzle and hot to trot out the gate and then later when the going gets tough nothing left but fizzle.
9
posted on
04/09/2014 1:29:04 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: PaulCruz2016
These polls are worthless! Virtually ALL the guys I play volleyball and softball with tell me I should run for the office but yet I'm not even listed amongs the "other" group........
Just consider what the results would be if I could gain access to the national stage.........
10
posted on
04/09/2014 1:29:07 PM PDT
by
Hot Tabasco
(Under Reagan spring always arrived on time.....)
To: cripplecreek
Obligatory graphic:
11
posted on
04/09/2014 1:30:11 PM PDT
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The Acronym explains the science.)
To: PaulCruz2016
Paul, Christie, and Huck are a WASTE OF TIME!!!!!
12
posted on
04/09/2014 1:33:16 PM PDT
by
G Larry
(There's the Beef!)
To: PaulCruz2016
The Pauls always poll well, even when real voting starts and they are being stomped.
13
posted on
04/09/2014 1:35:39 PM PDT
by
Ingtar
(The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
Just for the record: I did not post this article in Breaking News. This is now the third time recently that someone here has put a distinctly-not Breaking News article of mine in Breaking News. Am I being targeted to look bad?
To: PaulCruz2016
15
posted on
04/09/2014 1:42:07 PM PDT
by
edcoil
(Not a single republican was ever a slave owner. They were all democrats.)
To: All
So is all the keyword spam posted by multiple people, or, more likely, one butthurt bot-of-some-other-potential-GOP-presidential-candidate?
To: PaulCruz2016
If you want to whine about something, whine about why you picked PaulCruz2016 as a FR name.
That’ll come back to haunt you.
17
posted on
04/09/2014 1:51:10 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Responsibility2nd; PaulCruz2016
Especially since we all know why he put Cruz into his name when he signed up to campaign for Rand Paul.
That was the same tactic that the romneybots and Ron Paul people did, always mix the weirdo with a conservative, as cover.
It was always Ron or Romney, and some good conservative.
18
posted on
04/09/2014 2:05:49 PM PDT
by
ansel12
((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
To: PaulCruz2016
Numbers are close to meaningless this far out
19
posted on
04/09/2014 2:11:22 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: PaulCruz2016
Not sure, is polling first.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson