Posted on 09/27/2017 5:00:34 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
This week Jill Abramson, the estimable former executive editor of The New York Times, whom Ive always admired and never criticized, contended that I had been stoking the idea that the NYT had a vendetta against Hillary Clinton.
That is false.
What I have argued, repeatedly during the campaign and most recently nine days ago in an item about Hillary Clintons new book, is that the Times very badly erred in its wild over-coverage of the Clinton email issue, and that this distorted coverage was, in turn, one of many factors leading to Donald Trumps elevation to the presidency.
Heres an example of the kind of thing I had in mind: the blow-out front-page treatment in the Times, just 10 days before the election, of the Comey letter on Clintons emails....
(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...
Puhleeeeze!
The members of the media have such an overinflated concept of themselves and their “influence!””
If you just didn’t tell people how bad I am, I would have won!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.