Skip to comments.Hillary Clinton’s Reason For Opposing Brett Kavanaugh? Global Warming
Posted on 09/07/2018 2:15:47 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Former Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton wants supporters to tell their senators to vote against Judge Brett Kavanaugh becoming the newest justice on the U.S. Supreme Court.
Clintons main reason for opposing President Donald Trumps second Supreme Court nominee? Man-made global warming.
Replacing Kennedy with Kavanaugh would swing the Court to a new, hard-right majority that would rule against curbing greenhouse gases for yearsmaybe decadesthat we cant afford to waste on inaction, Clinton wrote in a series of tweets published Friday....
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Her big mouth and fat ass are causing all the problems with the environment.
I bet she does hate Trump for trying to turn around the money making scheme that makes them richer and the rest of us eating dirt.
The Cabbage Princess speaks
That wench couldn’t pass a third grade science test.
With her, it’s fake all the way down.
“Her big mouth and fat ass are causing all the problems with the environment.”
LOL. At least she’s consistent. Same gas.
These global warming, CO2-obsessed morons should lecture China and India for their knee deep filth.
She’s an ugly, fat disgrace to the Republic.
The obese,elderly, dishonest, smelly, criminal oaf should be in prison. Who cares what she says about anything? I only wznt to hrar last words. What a idiot loser.
That is really funny
You forgot “really sick”. I mean, what the hell’s wrong with her?
He won’t legislate from the bench. Specifically, he won’t legislate from the bench to impose Leftist doctrine. Therefore, Democrats hate him.
Does anyone have any synonyms for “slobbering moron” or “drooling idiot?” As true and appropriate as they are, I’m getting bored with them.
granny clinton has not been the same since she had to dodge all that
sniper fire !
try “drooling moron” or “slobbering idiot”
But we’re supposed to believe that global warming isn’t political.
What fever swamp did THAT assertion come out of?
Global warming has been a repeated cycle throughout the millennia that the Earth has been circling the sun, alternating with periods of intense cold, in which virtually all the liquid water on earth was locked in the solid form of ice, and glaciers covered whole continents, some reaching as far south as what is today the tropical zone. All done with no help from that feeble and very vulnerable species, mankind.
Even today, with all the technical prowess at the command of the very best and brightest of mankind, the capability to materially change the overall climate of an entire planet is still far beyond any human capability, and for sure, relying on the presence or absence of a minute quantity of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere as the means by which that change could be implemented, is to call upon some very magical thinking.
Now, the presence or absence of water, either as gaseous water vapor, liquid water, or frozen ice, is very much a factor in moderating current conditions, or over time, greatly affecting climatic conditions. But somehow, this is never put into computations of projected “climate change”, and the results are soon very badly skewed over time.
There is no “right” climate. Climate changes, human beings and all life on earth adapts to the change, some by learning, some by dying out, some by selective breeding giving precedence to those genetic combinations best suited to the changing conditions.
Madam Hillary Benghazi is still laboring under the delusion that somehow President Trump will be removed and SHE will be installed as President (Bubba promised her it was HER turn!) and she will get to name her own pick.
It sure has become obvious which of the Clintons is a the real America hating radical. Billy is shifty lefty but the witch is in a class by herself.
In fact, previous generations of state sovereignty-respecting Supreme Court justices had clarified not only that Congress cannot appropriate taxes in the name of state power issues, but also that powers not expressly constitutional delegated to the feds by the states are prohibited to the feds.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
"The smart crooks long ago figured out that getting themselves elected to federal office to make unconstitutional tax laws to fill their pockets is a much easier way to make a living than robbing banks." me
"Federal career lawmakers probably laugh all the way to the bank to deposit bribes for putting loopholes for the rich and corporations in tax appropriations laws, Congress actually not having the express constitutional authority to make most appropriations laws where domestic policy is concerned. Such laws are based on stolen state powers and uniquely associated stolen state revenues." me
So Hillary must want pro-global warming activist justices on the bench who are willing to declare that unconstitutional federal spending programs for global warming are constitutional.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.