Not following politics as closely since lately it gives me nausea, but when I first read that this nonsense was about an incident in high school, I WAS SURE that would be the last I read of it.
I NEVER thought it would have legs, as wobbly as they were, and am still in shock and i think this will HURT dems in the midterms.
Because it’s completely ####ing ridiculous.
And even if he HAD done something, though it’s quite obvious he didn’t, I thought dems were all about redemption for criminals, especially ones with only one or two offenses?
hypocrites.
I presume they want him to judge by the rule of law which states that a man is presumed innocent until proved guilty.
So the question I plan on asking libs I encounter is if they believe in this principle, and why he shouldn’t be judged using the same standard they expect him to judge by.