CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Presidential Debate Question

AP via Dow Jones | 11/11/03 | AP Staff

[Consort]

Luciferous Logolepsy

wwftd dictionary

[Consort]

Mrs. Byrne's Dictionary

[On the Road to Serfdom]

Trustman

I hope she is not a Woman's Studies major. Could she pass the classes with a name like that?

[Timesink]

Schadenfreude

This is the New York Times CNN Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.

---

This is the Mainstream Media Shenanigans ping list. Please freepmail me to be added or dropped.
Please note this is a medium- to high-volume list.
Please feel free to ping me if you come across a thread you would think worthy of this ping list. I can't catch them all!

[RedBloodedAmerican]

They only regret getting caught.

And they don't want to lose viewers, hence the "regret".

They all are alike, and belong together.

[Grampa Dave]

Clintoon None News is allways over the edge 24/7/365.

There is nothing this pos net would not do to harm conservatives, Christians, real Jews, and others who aren't liberal.

There is nothing the pos net would not do to make Castro, $oddomite, Ben Laden, and the rats in congress look good inspite of their grim realities.

[RJL]

epicaricacy
Not in my dictionary.

Not in mine either.

[BushCountry]

bump

[GulliverSwift]

I just looked it up in the OED and it's not there, believe it or not.

[Mr.Atos]

Send the good Doctor this one next time he complains about RightWing media.

CNN..."Bare and fallace!"

[GOPJ]

Is CNN brain-dead or what?

But when she arrived in Boston for the debate, Trustman wrote, "I was handed a note card with the Macs and PCs version of Clinton's boxers or briefs question" and told she couldn't ask her question "because it wasn't lighthearted enough and they wanted to modulate the event with various types of questions."

[Lancey Howard]

CNN was clearly not interested in a serious debate of the issues by people who would be President of the United States. They wanted a lighthearted moment for the evening's entertainment. How pathetic.

[gridlock]

I don't really think that light-hearted entertainment was what they were after at CNN. It is clear that the 'Rats are getting creamed on the issues. The more these dopes talk about Iraq and the economy, the more the public holds it's collective nose. The 'Rats are losing on national security, economics, domestic policy, abortion policy, religion, homeland defense, prescription drugs, social security and medicare. What else is there to talk about?

PC or Mac... Boxers or Briefs...

Anything but the issues. The more they talk about the issues, the more GWB goes up in the polls. The perfect debate for the 'Rats is a series of modulated attacks on the President separated by light-hearted moments where the candidates get to smile and pretend to be movie stars. CNN is just helping them along.

[FreeperinRATcage]

CNN: We Report, We Decide.

No, more like:

CNN: We Decide What We Report