[Luis Gonzalez]

"More polyphobia. I think you are a repressed polysexual who is acting out against polysexuals."

I guess I should point out the obvious to you.

I have Biblical precedent to argue in favor of polygamy.

Now, you cite the Constitutional passage that grants the Federal government the power to deny Mormons the right to engage in polygamy.

[jwalsh07]

I have Biblical precedent to argue in favor of polygamy.

Then argue for individual "transcendent liberty" for all. Take a position, any position.

Now, you cite the Constitutional passage that grants the Federal government the power to deny Mormons the right to engage in polygamy.

You're confused Luis, I believe in a republican form of government for all the states as the Constitution requires. You are the fellow arguing in favor of judicial fiat from a central authority. Try to keep the scorecard straight.

[John O]

I have Biblical precedent to argue in favor of polygamy.

Biblical precedent does support one man married to several women in the OT. However no precedent exists for one woman to marry several men. In the NT this is limited back to one man to one woman.

Interesting that you bring biblical approval into this. The bible clearly states that those who practice homosexuality are to be destroyed (OT). And that homosexual behavior is never moral (that is, those who practice it will not enter the kingdom of heaven) and that they who practice it will reap the recompence of their error.