Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan from Michigan; Utah Girl
I'd like to see the feds out of the marriage business completely myself,

It is possible for non-citizens to immigrate to the US either on a marriage visa or a fiance visa. Regulation of immigration is a federal power and responsibility. I do not favor extending those visas to homosexual couples. I also do not favor allowing polygamists to use those visas either. I really don't think it is possible for the federal government to not be involved in the issue of what is the definition of marriage and who can be married to each other.

You should read about the debate over the admission of Utah as a state. It was precisely the issue of polygamy that caused Congress to delay its admission. This was in part due to the full faith and credit clause of the constitution. The existing states were concerned that they would be required to recognize polygamous marriages recorded in Utah. It was not until Utah territory banned new polygamous marriages that it was allowed to become a state.

You can bury your head in the sand and claim that each state should be able to decide this issue, but the advocates of "gay marriage" are bent on using the courts to force all states recognize them. If the Supreme Court votes to force recognition of "gay marriage", it will be the Dred Scott decision of the 21st century.

10 posted on 01/05/2004 10:28:54 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Paleo Conservative
Thanks for the comments. I've read a good deal about Utah's admission to the United States. :)
11 posted on 01/05/2004 10:32:15 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
If the Supreme Court votes to force recognition of "gay marriage", it will be the Dred Scott decision of the 21st century.

No, it won't

There will be no nationwide military confrontation over gay marriage.

Some screaming matches, perhaps

12 posted on 01/05/2004 10:44:14 PM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
I can see both sides of the ruling issue. If the decision is federal, then some states will have to have a law that their constituents don't agree with (think abortion.) I'm pretty much for states rights, however the same sex marriage is a cultural issue, with the homosexual lobby trying to legislate it into action. And sorry to say, even though it makes me sick, I do think that one day America will have legal same sex marriages. Our culture is losing its values and is on that slippery slope to anything goes.
19 posted on 01/06/2004 7:53:30 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson