Exactly. I've always thought his photographic memory is what his supporters (including many in the media) mistake for his "genius". The lie about writing his own stuff I pointed out on the other thread, too. TIME seems a little fatuous here.
Their fatuity exceeded only by Clinton's own ego, perhaps.
I wonder just how many of these Democrat candidates really do vet their speeches and ideas through The Great Equivocator and actually seek his input. Or take it seriously when it's volunteered.
What I sense in this article is yet another example of "Look at me. I'm still Important. A Legend In My Own Mind..."