Updated FR Excerpt and Link Only or Deny Posting List due to Copyright Complaints

To: curmudgeonII

"I'm astounded that jewishworldrevew is on this list."

I'm sympathetic.

He needs the hits.

It's a one-man operation dependent on hits for advertising bucks.

(I miss Napster)

41 posted on 04/05/2004 4:19:18 PM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)

To: JohnHuang2; MeekOneGOP; nutmeg; Howlin; Pokey78; Ragtime Cowgirl; mhking; ...

42 posted on 04/05/2004 4:20:36 PM PDT by RonDog

To: Jim Robinson

But it is an important issue. For it is an issue about the freedom and disemination of information in this country. When people are not permitted to link to information or when the information disappears, the history and collective memory of our country is endangered. Of course it will go to the Supreme Court. and it will take millions. But it needs to. The Internet has changed the rules and we need to shape the change.

43 posted on 04/05/2004 4:26:58 PM PDT by mlmr (Honest officer, I wasn't speeding. This SUV is a low-flying rocket!)

I'm guessing that antiwar.com doesn't want their s**t posted on FR because many of us take it and use it for purposes of humor elsewhere, frequently on other mind-numbed robot-like knee-jerk liberal sites!

If it wasn't posted here, we wouldn't know about it (presumably).

44 posted on 04/05/2004 4:27:41 PM PDT by muawiyah

I'm guessing that antiwar.com doesn't want their s**t posted on FR because many of us take it and use it for purposes of humor elsewhere

No, it's because Raimondo had a hissy fit here after one of the antiwar.com writers pleaded guilty to terrorism charges and was sent to prison for a couple of decades (one of the "paintball" guys in Virginia).

His exit thread is kind of amusing, if I can find it.

45 posted on 04/05/2004 4:32:58 PM PDT by hellinahandcart

Wow, I am seriously surprised to see the Sun Sentinel on the list.

If I'm not mistaken, I think they're part of the LAT/WP empire.

46 posted on 04/05/2004 4:34:54 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)

To: Jim Robinson; GRRRRR; yall

Does that mean if I see an interesting article at pcworld.com that I can't say: "I saw an interesting article at PCWorld.Com and is a link."? Please advise... Maybe I should cancel my subscription to them?
19 GRRRRR

______________________________________

Well, you could probably do that. I doubt they'd sue for that. If they do, oh well.
30 -JR-

______________________________________

Hmmmm.. -- I see the lead story over at PC today says:

"Do You Really Need a New PC?"
There are lots of reasons to buy a new PC.

Not if you old one still works OK, fellas..

But there's also lots of ways to upgrade an old PC with, say, a new CPU.

Hey, thats more like it! Tell me more!

Now how in hell can PC sue you for what I just posted, --- if we are we still living in a free republic?

47 posted on 04/05/2004 4:35:41 PM PDT by tpaine (In their arrogance, a few infinitely shrewd imbeciles attempt to lay down the law for all of us.)

antiwar.com?

Bah. Who'd want their writing? The "behindnews" is so dripping with Justin's obsessions that it's like reading a psychiatrist's journal. Or watching Bedlam through a one-way mirror.

48 posted on 04/05/2004 4:38:39 PM PDT by DonaldDuke

To: hellinahandcart

Didn't catch that. You mean one of the boys "down the street" who went to stir over their terrorist training was an antiwar.com writer?

And here I thought most of those guys were just engineers and taxicab drivers.

My eldest saw the federales (and 35,000 other kinds of cops) take one of 'em down on a Sunday afternoon. Shut the neighborhood down to do it.

AlQaida and it's buddies failed to notice that Iraqi defectors and Kurdish refugees had moved into that neighborhood in large numbers.

49 posted on 04/05/2004 4:42:16 PM PDT by muawiyah

To: Jim Robinson; Kathy in Alaska; MoJo2001; LindaSOG; LaDivaLoca; Fawnn; Bethbg79; bentfeather; ...

IMPORTANT INFO REGARDING LINKING ARTICLES AND DO NOT LINK INFO PING

50 posted on 04/05/2004 4:42:48 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Support Free Republic!)

51 posted on 04/05/2004 4:43:47 PM PDT by hellinahandcart

To: Jim Robinson

I think FR is being singled out. I see articles from these places posted in Yahoo groups and other websites all the time. None of them (to my knowledge) has ever been threatened in this way.

52 posted on 04/05/2004 4:44:22 PM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)

The writer was Ismail Royer.

53 posted on 04/05/2004 4:46:14 PM PDT by hellinahandcart

To: hellinahandcart

54 posted on 04/05/2004 4:51:13 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)

To: CounterCounterCulture

Loser rag fit only for TP anyway -- ugh!

55 posted on 04/05/2004 4:51:36 PM PDT by StarCMC (Kalen is home!!! Kalen is home!!! Thank you for all your prayers and support!!)

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub

Bumped and Bookmarked with a grumble.

56 posted on 04/05/2004 4:55:03 PM PDT by boxerblues

It's growing because these lying pieces of scum media know we are on to them.

Sorry but I had to vent.

We can still paraphrase what they said and make our points.

57 posted on 04/05/2004 5:01:27 PM PDT by BushisTheMan

As if they will be missed!

58 posted on 04/05/2004 5:02:57 PM PDT by cyborg (Frankenfreude radio death watch has commenced)

To: Jim Robinson; Admin Moderator

Perhaps the Link at the top of the Admin Moderator's profile page could be modified to point to this thread (it's pointing to the older list).

It's an easy way (for some of us, um, seasoned folk) to remember where to find the taboo sites list.

59 posted on 04/05/2004 5:06:02 PM PDT by glock rocks (Only YOU can stop fundraisers. Small monthly donations from each of us can do it !!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794