To: blam
Would have been hominids, probably Neanderthal, not humans.
Homo sapiens are not older than 150,000 years.
5 posted on
06/21/2004 5:45:13 PM PDT by
motife
To: motife
Homo sapiens are not older than 150,000 years. Wouldn't this shoot down "Out of Africa"?
8 posted on
06/21/2004 5:52:55 PM PDT by
Mike Darancette
(Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.)
To: motife
"Would have been hominids, probably Neanderthal, not humans. "
Isn't that a little early for Neanderthal?
300,000 BC is usually the earliest date shown on timelines for them.
(On the other hand, 400,000 BC...probably some use of fire in limited areas.)
To: motife
You mean homo sapiens are believed by many scientists to have not been around longer ago than 150,000 years, right?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson