I read his pre-9/11 UBL book in the week after 9/11 and was disturbed that his reporting was ignored. Bondansky probably wrote a better 9/11 report before 9/11 than those political hacks who are going to press with their "report" on Thursday.
However, what's even more disturbing is that three years later Bondansky's work is still being ignored!
I think because Bodansky does not appeal to a vanity mindset that portrays American intel and military as all knowing and all victorious in the war on terror (even pre 9/11) and thus tends to be ignored or blown off becaus eof the uncomfortable truths that he brings to light. It is uncomfortable reading for those on the left (because he destroys Clinton policy) and right (like demolishsing sacred cows like victory in Afghanistan).