Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The title of WND is a bit of hype.

Judicial Watch is pushing it.

I think it's a good question, why is John Lehman's signature on the citation, when he said he never saw it, never signed it.

1 posted on 09/08/2004 2:45:08 PM PDT by QQQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: QQQQQ
WND = Words of No Distinction.
2 posted on 09/08/2004 2:47:04 PM PDT by bcoffey (Bush/Cheney: Real men taking charge, talking straight, telling the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

Judicial Watch has a long, loooong road back to credibility, in my book.


3 posted on 09/08/2004 2:47:16 PM PDT by martin_fierro (A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Bob J; Interesting Times

More good news.......


4 posted on 09/08/2004 2:47:46 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Bush Democrats = Zell's Angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kerryforreal?; Admin Moderator; hobson; BlessedBeGod; Samwise; bcoffey

Here is the link and the article that "kerryforreal?" tried to post earlier. (Kerry Navy Probe Getting LARGER!!!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1210401/posts )

I personally doubt that a troll would post such article.

I think newbie just didn't know how to post an article.

"kerryforreal?" -- Please see how it's done, you need to post the actual title, can add clarifying remarks in paranthesis, if it's appropriate, and be sure to post the link next time, and an excerpt.

But it's an interesting find -- don't get discouraged, just do it right the next time. :)


5 posted on 09/08/2004 2:49:44 PM PDT by QQQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ
Zippo Warrior

6 posted on 09/08/2004 2:49:56 PM PDT by Mark (Treason doth never prosper, for if it prosper, NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

Just took a quick look at the PDF of the JW letter to SecNAV.

The NEW material here (well, new to me), is that JW's
theory is that the final (#3 Silver, #2 Bronze) citations
are evidence that the people who originally issued the
medals were not authorized to do so, and Kerry was trying
to paper over that.

Although it might just be hand-waving (something that JW
is notorious for), it will cause some members of the
emerging media to keep the issue in front of the electorate.
That is to say; every little bit helps.

Is it possible that the original Citations were forgeries?
And that Kerry had bungled the sigs?


10 posted on 09/08/2004 2:53:41 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

Here's the short version of the letter at:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2004/secnavkerryltr.pdf

Sent to SecNAV and IG
Raises issue of combat "V" on Silver Star (SS)
Quotes Lehman disclaiming involvement with SS Citation#3
Points out that earlier citations lacked authority
Suggests foul play ("autopen") on cit#3
Even if Cit#3 not a forgery, fails time limits on issuance
Questions 4 (vs. 2) stars on VSM
Points out Kerry's DD215, which added the VSM stars,
and failed to correct the SS+V


12 posted on 09/08/2004 3:15:34 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

AND speaking of Bush's National Guard service . How come the RNC isn't running with the idea that Edwards could have defended his country instead of entring college in 1970 I believe ..


13 posted on 09/08/2004 3:42:08 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson