Skip to comments.
Mapes Wished to "Save the World from a Bush Presidency"
Media Research Center ^
| 9-23-04
| Medial Reseach Center
Posted on 09/23/2004 10:50:02 AM PDT by FlyLow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
1
posted on
09/23/2004 10:50:02 AM PDT
by
FlyLow
To: FlyLow
Appearing on MSNBC's Imus in the Morning on Wednesday, Fineman fretted that due to the CBS scandal, it is getting "increasingly difficult to prove" that the rest of the media strive for "objectivity" and want to be "fair" and "even- handed." Well, there's an easy way around that problem. Start being fair and even-handed.
2
posted on
09/23/2004 10:51:12 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Kerry could have left 'Nam within a week if Purple Hearts were awarded for shots to the foot.)
To: FlyLow
3
posted on
09/23/2004 10:51:35 AM PDT
by
happygrl
To: FlyLow
Fineman fretted that due to the CBS scandal, it is getting "increasingly difficult to prove" that the rest of the media strive for "objectivity" and want to be "fair" and "even- handed."Sweet! Perhaps that explains why they were so nasty at the presser this morning.
Fineman also predicted that "if Roger Ailes and Fox had done something like this, you know, the world would be on fire."
Predicted? That's a known fact.
4
posted on
09/23/2004 10:51:55 AM PDT
by
Howlin
(What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
To: FlyLow
So now when she is indicted, she can claim she was insane?
To: FlyLow
She wanted to save us from Bush, but ended up doing something infinitely more valuable--she saved us from Dan Rather and CBS News. The Lord works in strange ways.
6
posted on
09/23/2004 10:52:42 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: FlyLow
7
posted on
09/23/2004 10:52:57 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
To: dirtboy
Exactly! And the reason Roger Ailes and Fox News are not likely to find themselves in this kind of situation is because they are fair and balanced.
8
posted on
09/23/2004 10:52:57 AM PDT
by
bigbob
To: happygrl
because she wanted to "save the world from a George Bush presidencyAnd, save the world from unborn babies,the word of God, school choice, etc etc etc.
9
posted on
09/23/2004 10:53:06 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: dirtboy
Well, there's an easy way around that problem. Start being fair and even-handed. They simply can't. They think being fair and balanced is the same as being right wing. They HAVE to slant the news and show a liberal bias, it's in their blood.
10
posted on
09/23/2004 10:53:54 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: FlyLow
So why is Little Mary in hiding now? Why not come out and say "I want to save the world from a George Bush presidency"?
11
posted on
09/23/2004 10:54:56 AM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
To: Howlin
The tap dancing among the MSM is becoming deafening.
LOL!
12
posted on
09/23/2004 10:55:01 AM PDT
by
EggsAckley
(......so many vanities....................so little bandwidth.........)
To: EggsAckley
13
posted on
09/23/2004 10:55:43 AM PDT
by
bootless
(Never Forget - And Never Again)
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: FlyLow
"save the world from a George Bush presidency,... I haven't heard such rhetoric from the liberal left since the late, great, Ronald Reagan was President.
The similarity in their reactions to Dubya' is a good sign which is very comforting in an abstract sort of way. : )
15
posted on
09/23/2004 10:56:42 AM PDT
by
EGPWS
To: FlyLow
"...CBS News producer Mary Mapes became 'obsessed'..."?
Well, beyond this obvious thought, are we to assume and accept that she was allowed to perform cart blanche, and that no one at SeeBS offered any oversight?
It's a culture of loonie left bias.
16
posted on
09/23/2004 10:57:48 AM PDT
by
Chummy
("I Rather Know when I See BS." RepublicanAttackSquad.biz: "A vote 4 Kerry is a vote 4 Osama")
To: FlyLow
This idea of "saving the nation from Bush" is quite common in many of new york's professional offices. Since election day, 2000 seemingly rational people transform into venomous secular church ladies at the mention of Bush and immediatly attack the person that dares breath the word Bush in a positive light. It really has gotten so extreme that we are starting to see the first cracks to the ruling establishment in the form of the rathergate exposure. Expect a tidal wave of additional scandals as psychotic leftie controlled organizations decide to come clean.
To: FlyLow
And that, to me, means obsession, and as you pointed out the other day, you know, that's what editors are for. Editors are there to harness the energy, sometimes obsessive energy of reporters and they clearly didn't do it in this case."Come on, Howard, there wasn't an "editor" who should have stopped the story. Mapes has a direct line to Rather. There is no "editor" in between. The only "editor" who could have injected some reason into this partisan exercise was Dan Rather, but he was either too stupid or too partisan to do anything but go along.
To: FlyLow
Mapes is obsessed with hatred for Bush, and has thrown out all semblance of objectivity and journalistic integrity. If CBS doesn't fire her, they can never again proclaim themselves to be an objective news source.
Of course, we all know they aren't. But at least in the past, they tried to hide their bias.
19
posted on
09/23/2004 10:58:28 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Flush the Johns - vote Bush/Cheney 04)
To: FlyLow
20
posted on
09/23/2004 10:58:45 AM PDT
by
jmstein7
(A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson