Lehrer Stacks Deck Against Bush

newsmax.com ^ | Sept. 30, 2004

[lilylangtree]

Get rid of Lehrer!

[Balding_Eagle]

I don't necessarily disagree with any of the points made in NewsMax, but this isn't going to help us. It is important to have a correct analysis of what went wrong, but the timing makes it sound a little like whining. Leave whining to the Libs. Buck up, and move on.

[hford02]

The questions were all stacked against Bush. Why wasn't there a question about Kerry's bill to gut the CIA after the first WTC bombing? Or why he never felt inclined to attend intelligence committee hearings. Or which weapons would now be left if his votes in the Senate had carried a majority. Or how does the experience of conspiring with the enemy while in uniform set an example for the troops who must now defend us from terrorists (wouldn't his postwar activity excuse any soldier for joining the Al-Queda?) THE SENATOR HAS SO MUCH EXPERIENCE NEGOTIATING WITH AMERICA'S ENEMIES MAYBE HE JUST DOESN'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FRIENDS AND FOES. The president looked tired because he's been assaulted since the Chinese took out our recon plane in the early days of this term. Maybe it's too much to ask for this man to confront the realities of being a wartime president while campaigning against a wannabe pretender like Kerry. This double duty is a terrible burden. God bless him.