Posted on 10/04/2004 7:31:17 AM PDT by dead
Let's say they are either 1)above 3 on the Kinsey Scale, or 2)better actresses than I think they are.
Editorial: Do you ever actually bother to read what other people post? Ever hear of adjectives and adverbs?
The power women have comes from the man. She can say no all she wants and he can still bonk her on the head and take what he wants.
It is cornerstone of civilized human behavior for the man to give the woman the power to say no. It isn't intrinsically hers.
HLA!!!!
"The power women have comes from the man. She can say no all she wants and he can still bonk her on the head and take what he wants. "
Amazing!
Your post is a generalization that holds true only in certian arenas, and only with certian women. What you're saying only applies when the man is bigger and stronger than the woman, a situation that may occur often but does not occur always. This being the case, you cannot state this as a failproof truth, since it is not failproof.
Paging Bill Clinton....
You're nitpicking on that one. Look at the status of women in Arabic Muslim societies, even today. It isn't very far removed from what he posits.
It certainly wouldn't be Britany and Madonna. ;^)
The man's name is "Samuel Colt".
Yeah look - even some radical feminists support the Taliban enslavement of women because we have no right to impose our values on their society. Moral relativism run riot.
No, I'm not nitpicking. Would you prefer a society similar to the Arab Muslim one that you mention? My only point was that he cannot state something as a truth when it obviously is not. What he is talking about are societal and phyisical differences, not emotional and intellectual ones. These differences may change from relationship to relationship and from era to era.
"The power women have comes from the man. She can say no all she wants and he can still bonk her on the head and take what he wants.
It is cornerstone of civilized human behavior for the man to give the woman the power to say no. It isn't intrinsically hers."
You are wrong, and on several levels. Let's start with the biological level, OK?
Throughout the animal kingdom, it is the female which decides what mate to accept. Males perform all sorts of dances, sport all sorts of plumage, etc., in order to get a female to accept them as mates. We do the same as humans. We court our females, offering them gifts, as many birds do. We dress well (at least some of us do), groom our plumage, and strut about, as do many animals, in hopes that a female will notice us and accept our advances.
Yes, men can rape women. It's an abberation of nature for a male to rape a female, however. We are justifiably angered at rape, and ostracize the rapist. It goes against nature.
I'm afraid your understanding of the relationship between the male and female of the human species is skewed for some reason or another.
Again, I am trying not to be unkind to some of you, since I know you aren't stupid. But really, is it that hard to comprehend what I am saying?
Are there women stronger than men? Yes. But that says nothing about the psychological difference between men and women.
I never said that it is impossible for a woman to be stronger than a man. So why are you putting those words in my mouth? If that is what you think I said, go reread my post.
You took the words right out of my mouth. Everyone knows that lesbians are really only frustrated women looking for a caveman type man to take over their lives for them.
The power women have comes from the man. She can say no all she wants and he can still bonk her on the head and take what he wants.
And then said:
Are there women stronger than men? Yes. But that says nothing about the psychological difference between men and women. I never said that it is impossible for a woman to be stronger than a man. So why are you putting those words in my mouth? If that is what you think I said, go reread my post.
That should be clear enough. Do you want to try again?
Some people have a misconception that men cannot be sexually harassed. For them I have only two words JANET RENO, comin' around the desk at'cha.
Amen!!!
I think gays and lesbians don't want legal equality.
The status quo (limited social acceptance compounded with some opposition and soft bigotry) is what they want, to make a fuss about their "situation".
If they even had full social acceptance, they'd be just ignored, for them a fate worse than "discrimination".
Perpetual victims...
Duh. Thank you for the blinding revelation.
"I suspect most men would shrink at the reality of a threesome. (pun intended)"
I'm always up for the challenge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.