Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/31/2004 8:07:37 PM PST by NavyPilot45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NavyPilot45

It is time to go after CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, and take our airwaves back.


2 posted on 10/31/2004 8:10:16 PM PST by Viet-Boat-Rider (((KERRY IS A NARCISSISTIC LIAR, GOLDBRICKER, AND TRAITOR!)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NavyPilot45

DAMN! Talk about NEW!
2004-11-01


3 posted on 10/31/2004 8:10:47 PM PST by fuzzy122 (GBGB [God Bless George Bush] and Our Armed Forces!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NavyPilot45

What happened to honest journalism.

LOL,LOL Your kidding right? Is that what you really expect from the MSM. LOL! Just busting nuggets Pilot.


4 posted on 10/31/2004 8:11:08 PM PST by mk2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NavyPilot45

You mean this here?


Brokaw interview with Kerry. Interesting response to military records question.
MSNBC ^ | 2004-10-28

Posted on 10/28/2004 5:52:57 PM PDT

Brokaw: Someone has analyzed the President's military aptitude tests and yours, and concluded that he has a higher IQ than you do. Kerry: That's great. More power. I don't know how they've done it, because my record is not public. So I don't know where you're getting that from.

Thesese are some of the comments at http://www.freerepublic.com/
 

  1. Brokaw gave kerry a softball question and suddenly found that he had him down on the mat. But of course he never followed up on it.
  2. Like for instance, "Why isn't your record public? Why do you demand that Bush should release all his service records but hide yours?"
  3. This interview, from a guy who said he was concerned that the American public expected the news media to be objective, is worthless, a Kerry promotion under the guise of honest reporting by an MSM pimp.
  4. Kerry admits his military records are not public!
  5. Keep him talking. He won't be a Senator after a few hours of loose talk either.
  6. Well, the truth shall set you free. Maybe someone needs to pass this on to the SwiftBoat Vets for their FYI. A public admission regarding specifically that his military records are not public.
  7. If Kerry's record, as he says, is not public and someone has analyzed it, does it mean that at least this "someone" has Kerry's record without Kerry's knowledge and permission?

6 posted on 10/31/2004 8:11:51 PM PST by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NavyPilot45

MSM has basically decided to NOT investigate any controversies surrounding Kerry. They have given him a pass on nearly every questionable aspect of his past.

MSM have been completely inept in this election cycle.


7 posted on 10/31/2004 8:15:02 PM PST by TomGuy (His VN crumbling, he says 'move on'. So now, John Kerry is running on Bob KerrEy's Senate record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NavyPilot45

Not suprising, given the source. Anwyay, regarding Kerry's record, it strikes me that the central question about his discharge must already be in a public record. When Kerry was hired as an assistant DA in Boston, he would have had to fill out an application, even if it were a mere formality. Every job application for every government job, even in the early 70s, asks if you have ever served in the military (because nearly all gov employers give preference to vets). They would have asked if he were discharged, and if so, what the discharge was. SO....do a Right to Know request under Mass. state law and demand his job application form which is a public record.


8 posted on 10/31/2004 8:16:59 PM PST by Ilya Mourometz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NavyPilot45

They edited it out? Unfreakingbelievable.

Talk about George Orwell and the Memory Hole.


9 posted on 10/31/2004 8:17:18 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NavyPilot45

It may have something to do with the fact that the IQ story originated with Web pundit Steve Sailer (http://www.isteve.com/), who did get his information from the Kerry website itself -- the results of some obscure test whose significance no one realized when the document dump was posted. Even Kerry didn't know anything about it, evidently. The edit might be a reflection of the realization "We did it to ourselves!" circulating back to the Kerry people.


10 posted on 10/31/2004 8:18:24 PM PST by Deklane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NavyPilot45

There is no honor among liberals....


11 posted on 10/31/2004 8:19:27 PM PST by eagle11 (If you value America's future.....VOTE Bush TUESDAY November 2, 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NavyPilot45

Welcome to FR!


12 posted on 10/31/2004 8:21:03 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NavyPilot45
Been like that all year. He got a pass on it, and the Bush campaign didn't jump on it early enough. That's why this race is as close as it is. They defined Skerry as a flip-flopper early, and rode it too long. They should have hit his voting record and liberalisim right after the RNC. I think we still win though, it just didn't have to be this close.
14 posted on 10/31/2004 8:22:59 PM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NavyPilot45

Yeah I saw it. Amazing, given that they left the original unedited interview up on their site for all the world to see.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6354942/

I wouldn't be surprised if that too disapeared as well.

Brokaw. Whoda thunk it? LOL. It's amazing, they're dropping like flies.


15 posted on 10/31/2004 8:24:56 PM PST by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NavyPilot45

Has anyone questioned whether Kerry used the GI Bill to attend Boston College Law School 1973-1976? He would have been authorized to use those funds if he had an HONORABLE DISCHARGE.


22 posted on 10/31/2004 8:32:57 PM PST by V4bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NavyPilot45
Brokaw: The flip side of that is that if you had been president, Saddam Hussein would still be in power. Because you...

Kerry: Not necessarily at all.

Brokaw: But you have said you wouldn't go to war against him...

Kerry: That's not true. Because under the inspection process, Saddam Hussein was required to destroy those kinds of materials and weapons.

Brokaw: But he wasn't destroying them...

Kerry: But that's what you have inspectors for...

***
America has lost 10 points on its collective average IQ for having to listen to this guy for the last several months.
28 posted on 10/31/2004 8:44:43 PM PST by Jim_Curtis (Liberals lie at the premise, accept their premise and you can only lose the argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NavyPilot45

I am wondering if you could consider renaming this thread to something like "NBC edits Kerry's Words.." Or something that highlights what has been done.


34 posted on 10/31/2004 10:37:07 PM PST by MistyCA (Sign the Form 180, Kerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson