Posted on 12/02/2004 11:39:14 AM PST by Mr. Silverback
Dead but his work is still enshrined at Indiana University and subsidized by taxpayers.
I could be wrong, but I thought that Leni Riefenstahl actually did "good" work prior to 1933. Again I could be wrong, but I recall reading, seeing on TV(?) something to that effect.
In any case, Michael Moore couldn't hold her purse. Regardless of her product during Adolph's reign, she was at least talented and a 'true artist'.
Wait I just found this, I was right; Leni Riefenstahl . She was an artist long before her involvement with the Nazis.
Oh' you can bet your last dollar on that. Hollyweird will have to find some nomination for it.
How about "Most absurd fictional nonfiction movie"
No, wait F- 9/11 would win that hands down
Leni remained unwilling to apologize for her past. She just claimed that she was misunderstood and distant during those years.
Fritz Lang could have had her job. He fled to America instead. Everyone has choices.
Leni Riefenstahl was honored by the Academy at the Oscars when they showed her picture among those who had died in the previous year.
Satan's Children at "Play"
Kinsey was a Pedophile.
The pedophiles helped the Gays get power, now the Gays will help the Pedophiles.
Kinsey Crimes & Consequences, by Judith A. Reisman
Refenstahl is extremely influential on the way movies look. You can't avoid her. To not consider her an important film artist is to put one's head in the sand. Same with Eisenstein.
"Is this actor, Liam, very left? Why would he do this part? Who in their right mind would do this part?"
Liam is married to one of Vanessa Redgrave's daughters. Vanessa has been a screaming lib all her adult life:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1289656/posts
Should actors only play virtuous characters? There have been films about Hitler and Stalin too.
Although I've known who Kensey was for decades, I had never known about some of the information in this Colsen commentary. When seeing some of the trailers for this film, I surmised that information the likes of what Colsen revealed here was probably involved. I'm glad to see that confirmed.
The moral relativist overtones of this movie are unmistakable. IMO, this movie is going to advance a lot more than male/female relations. I doubt any of us thinks this had any impact on Hollywierd's decision to herald the life of Kensey. Nah, not a chance...
Several years ago, around the time of Bill Clinton's impeachment, Liam Neeson told an interviewer that he regarded Clinton as a hero. Portraying Kinsey as a great man isn't much of a stretch for a guy like that.
"According to a recent John Leo column, this "research" includes the detailed notes of a pedophile who sexualy manipulated a child for 24 hours."
Many children were molested, referred to by some as "The Children of Table 34":
http://www.rsvpamerica.org/TABLE34.htm
If Kinsey had only had AIDS and a male lover, Neeson would be a lock.
I think I'm the only one here who has seen the film and Kinsey is not portrayed as an angel by any means. The child molestor he interviews is portrayed exactly as such...a very loathsome character who repels Kinsey's assistant into leaving the room. Kinsey remains and interviews him through gritted teeth 'in the interest of science'.
Ping.
Mutilating yourself is a pretty over the top mental illness, and common sense tells us that a legitimate researcher into sex is not busy sharing research assistants with his wife.
I would support Kinsey collecting information on child molestors because such information could be useful to society. But one gets the strong impression that Kinsey was a pervert first and a serious researcher second. I think this movie will have the opposite effect to the one intended.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.