Skip to comments.
Clintonista's Indictment Kept Secret for a Year
NewsMax.com ^
| 1/08/05
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 01/08/2005 12:13:31 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-256 next last
To: kattracks
21
posted on
01/08/2005 12:25:33 PM PST
by
woofie
(Proudly posting inane comments since 1998)
To: kattracks
Though Hillary Clinton's former finance chairman David Rosen was actually indicted in 2003, the Bush administration kept it secret till the indictment was unsealed late Friday, a move that spared the former first couple and the Democratic Party significant embarrassment during the height of the 2004 presidential campaign.The obvious question:
Why has the President been treating the Clintons with courtesy and kid gloves (or even velvet gloves) after all the back-biting, criticism, and innuendo these two creeps have heaped upon him?
To: sofaman
There are a lot of great minds on this site!
To: drt1
What ever happened to simply disclosing the indictment when it comes down, in the normal course. Maybe they wish to obtain a conviction and didn't want it spun as a political move by the Bush DOJ.
I say "maybe" sarcastically as it is patently clear that is why it was just unsealed. They must be ready for "showtime" (aka "the trial").
To: Askel5
Translation, please.
(I'm not in the mood to parse out what you just said there)
To: kattracks
This was a smart political move on the part of the Bush admin. During impeachment, the Clintons effectively turned themselves into martys. Any legal action taken against Hillary will be portrayed as such by her staff, the democrats and the MSM.
Expect similar treatment of Sandy Burger. THere is no political profit for the GOP in pursuing this stuff.
26
posted on
01/08/2005 12:31:45 PM PST
by
tjg
To: cardinal4
All reports are there was no tape of Berger.
Having said that, I'm confident he'll be indicted eventually, too.
To: F16Fighter
"Why has the President been treating the Clintons with courtesy and kid gloves (or even velvet gloves) after all the back-biting, criticism, and innuendo these two creeps have heaped upon him?"
1. "New tone in Washington..."
2. "Compassionate conservatism..."
28
posted on
01/08/2005 12:32:23 PM PST
by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: woofie
Good Point!
Here ya go
29
posted on
01/08/2005 12:32:54 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
To: All
Tonken says he handed out checks to "certain pols" that were "illegal". And he personally witnessed a "brown bag" stuffed with cash going "someplace it shouldn't."
Sounds like business as usual for the Clintonistas.
Was Paul the guy that wound up in jail in S.America? Anyone know?
30
posted on
01/08/2005 12:33:30 PM PST
by
rodguy911
(rodguy911:First let's get rid of the UN and then the ACLU, or vice versa..)
To: Czar
It might be a simple clear cut court proceeding will yield the most results
31
posted on
01/08/2005 12:36:34 PM PST
by
woofie
(Proudly posting inane comments since 1998)
To: rodguy911
32
posted on
01/08/2005 12:37:04 PM PST
by
woofie
(Proudly posting inane comments since 1998)
To: Mo1
33
posted on
01/08/2005 12:37:38 PM PST
by
woofie
(Proudly posting inane comments since 1998)
To: kattracks
There's got to be a liberal spin to this about how Bush manipulated this. I'm waiting to hear it. I'm sure we'll get the talking points on how it's Bush's fault on tomorrows talk shows.
34
posted on
01/08/2005 12:38:19 PM PST
by
Arkie2
To: F16Fighter
I have wondered the same thing. I seem to remember when George H. Bush ran against Clinton he had information on Bubba's drug use and info on the Brother himself and also Gennifer Flowers. he refused to let us know what an awful prick Clinton was, It got him defeated. Nice guys usually finish last and GWB would have finished last too if the Swiftees hadnt stepped up and told the truth.
To: cyncooper
I assumed that there would cameras in a viewing area where people go to look at classified documents. So much for security and safekeeping of classified documents!
36
posted on
01/08/2005 12:39:34 PM PST
by
cardinal4
(W's 3.5 million pop vote isnt a mandate, but algores .5 million is??)
To: Czar
"1. "New tone in Washington..." 2. "Compassionate conservatism..."
3. 900 missing FBI files
4. (adjusting tinfoil hat) As per NWO "instructions"
To: F16Fighter
Why has the President been treating the Clintons with courtesy and kid gloves In Politics, timing is important. This would have been ignored pre-Nov 2, and '06 and '08 are far enough away for the memories to linger.
Hopefully, this will go to trial around March-April '06 and put a taint on the already odoriferous Swillary's reelection
38
posted on
01/08/2005 12:40:19 PM PST
by
digger48
To: woofie
Would ya like me to pour it for ya too??? :0)
39
posted on
01/08/2005 12:40:25 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
To: Mo1
40
posted on
01/08/2005 12:40:51 PM PST
by
woofie
(Proudly posting inane comments since 1998)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-256 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson