Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clintonista's Indictment Kept Secret for a Year
NewsMax.com ^ | 1/08/05 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 01/08/2005 12:13:31 PM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-256 next last
To: kattracks

dittos


21 posted on 01/08/2005 12:25:33 PM PST by woofie (Proudly posting inane comments since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Though Hillary Clinton's former finance chairman David Rosen was actually indicted in 2003, the Bush administration kept it secret till the indictment was unsealed late Friday, a move that spared the former first couple and the Democratic Party significant embarrassment during the height of the 2004 presidential campaign.

The obvious question:

Why has the President been treating the Clintons with courtesy and kid gloves (or even velvet gloves) after all the back-biting, criticism, and innuendo these two creeps have heaped upon him?

22 posted on 01/08/2005 12:26:28 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sofaman

There are a lot of great minds on this site!


23 posted on 01/08/2005 12:26:31 PM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: drt1
What ever happened to simply disclosing the indictment when it comes down, in the normal course.

Maybe they wish to obtain a conviction and didn't want it spun as a political move by the Bush DOJ.

I say "maybe" sarcastically as it is patently clear that is why it was just unsealed. They must be ready for "showtime" (aka "the trial").

24 posted on 01/08/2005 12:29:30 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Askel5

Translation, please.

(I'm not in the mood to parse out what you just said there)


25 posted on 01/08/2005 12:30:30 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This was a smart political move on the part of the Bush admin. During impeachment, the Clintons effectively turned themselves into martys. Any legal action taken against Hillary will be portrayed as such by her staff, the democrats and the MSM.

Expect similar treatment of Sandy Burger. THere is no political profit for the GOP in pursuing this stuff.

26 posted on 01/08/2005 12:31:45 PM PST by tjg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

All reports are there was no tape of Berger.

Having said that, I'm confident he'll be indicted eventually, too.


27 posted on 01/08/2005 12:31:46 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

"Why has the President been treating the Clintons with courtesy and kid gloves (or even velvet gloves) after all the back-biting, criticism, and innuendo these two creeps have heaped upon him?"

1. "New tone in Washington..."

2. "Compassionate conservatism..."


28 posted on 01/08/2005 12:32:23 PM PST by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Good Point!

Here ya go


29 posted on 01/08/2005 12:32:54 PM PST by Mo1 (Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All
Tonken says he handed out checks to "certain pols" that were "illegal". And he personally witnessed a "brown bag" stuffed with cash going "someplace it shouldn't."

Sounds like business as usual for the Clintonistas.

Was Paul the guy that wound up in jail in S.America? Anyone know?
30 posted on 01/08/2005 12:33:30 PM PST by rodguy911 (rodguy911:First let's get rid of the UN and then the ACLU, or vice versa..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Czar

It might be a simple clear cut court proceeding will yield the most results


31 posted on 01/08/2005 12:36:34 PM PST by woofie (Proudly posting inane comments since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

I think Paul is the guy


32 posted on 01/08/2005 12:37:04 PM PST by woofie (Proudly posting inane comments since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

I will also need a coke


33 posted on 01/08/2005 12:37:38 PM PST by woofie (Proudly posting inane comments since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

There's got to be a liberal spin to this about how Bush manipulated this. I'm waiting to hear it. I'm sure we'll get the talking points on how it's Bush's fault on tomorrows talk shows.


34 posted on 01/08/2005 12:38:19 PM PST by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

I have wondered the same thing. I seem to remember when George H. Bush ran against Clinton he had information on Bubba's drug use and info on the Brother himself and also Gennifer Flowers. he refused to let us know what an awful prick Clinton was, It got him defeated. Nice guys usually finish last and GWB would have finished last too if the Swiftees hadnt stepped up and told the truth.


35 posted on 01/08/2005 12:39:05 PM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

I assumed that there would cameras in a viewing area where people go to look at classified documents. So much for security and safekeeping of classified documents!


36 posted on 01/08/2005 12:39:34 PM PST by cardinal4 (W's 3.5 million pop vote isnt a mandate, but algores .5 million is??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Czar
"1. "New tone in Washington..."

2. "Compassionate conservatism..."

3. 900 missing FBI files

4. (adjusting tinfoil hat) As per NWO "instructions"

37 posted on 01/08/2005 12:40:18 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Why has the President been treating the Clintons with courtesy and kid gloves

In Politics, timing is important. This would have been ignored pre-Nov 2, and '06 and '08 are far enough away for the memories to linger.

Hopefully, this will go to trial around March-April '06 and put a taint on the already odoriferous Swillary's reelection

38 posted on 01/08/2005 12:40:19 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Would ya like me to pour it for ya too??? :0)


39 posted on 01/08/2005 12:40:25 PM PST by Mo1 (Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Wow ...Thanks so much


40 posted on 01/08/2005 12:40:51 PM PST by woofie (Proudly posting inane comments since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-256 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson