[Dataman]

Using the same standards of my opponents, I would say anything from a secular site is not credible since they are admittedly biased and cannot therefore be objective.

Another objection would be that personal correspondence is always suspect. Case in point: Their elevated blood pressure at Patterson's letter to Sunderland admitting there are no transitional forms, real or imaginary.

[gobucks]

the secular sites are good, however, for watching how they keep each other 'on the reservation'. Sort of like a barometer...

[Tribune7]

Another objection would be that personal correspondence is always suspect.

As are exceprts from letters. We are witnessing Mr. Carrier have a crisis of faith.