To: lavrenti; hellinahandcart; sauropod; cyborg; Clemenza; Oschisms; NYCVirago; Gabz; ...
Stephanie Keith for The New York Times Carmela Pampillonia says she found her Catholic parish "very accepting" of her wedding at five months along. |
|
|
2 posted on
03/12/2005 2:54:00 PM PST by
NYC GOP Chick
(www.Hillary-Watch.org)
To: NYC GOP Chick
3 posted on
03/12/2005 2:57:00 PM PST by
cyborg
(http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
To: NYC GOP Chick
We settle for shreds in today's culture.
5 posted on
03/12/2005 2:58:29 PM PST by
mlmr
(It is time for all good men and women to come to the aid of their country...)
To: NYC GOP Chick
To: NYC GOP Chick
At five months along, she should never have been married in the Catholic Church because, with a baby on the way, she's not entering into the Sacrament freely and without encumbrance. Shotgun weddings are NOT valid! This priest ought to be horsewhipped!
She could have had a civil wedding with the fancy dress, and the reception I'm sure her parents paid dearly for, then after the baby was born, gotten married in a small Church ceremony, where the Sacrament would be valid
19 posted on
03/12/2005 3:09:59 PM PST by
SuziQ
To: NYC GOP Chick; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; ...
Carmela Pampillonia says she found her Catholic parish "very accepting" of her wedding at five months along.
Is SCANDAL no longer a word in the Catholic lexicon?
129 posted on
03/12/2005 7:58:29 PM PST by
narses
(St James the Moor-slayer, Pray for us! +)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson