Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Anti-Bubba182
Strange, isn't it, that when the WaPo printed the story back in February, that they only showed one half of the email exchange. You would have thought that they would have wanted to see the other half before buying into the story.
12 posted on 04/21/2005 6:30:24 PM PDT by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: William McKinley
I bet they had everything, all the info. One of their goons had to see the FR posts on this. It would only be reasonable to watch the site where the posts occured.

I don't believe that they didn't know who they were dealing with when they ran the story in the first place. They would not risk it.

15 posted on 04/21/2005 6:44:26 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: William McKinley
when the WaPo printed the story back in February, that they only showed one half of the email exchange

This is why there is media bias. The Media is like a court trial where only one side gets to present evidence. Sure, they are telling the truth ( most of the time), but it is only half the truth.

39 posted on 04/22/2005 5:33:46 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson