Skip to comments.
Child Population Dwindles in San Francisco
A.P. ^
| 5/24/05
| By LISA LEFF, Associated Press Writer
Posted on 05/25/2005 6:23:27 AM PDT by yooling
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: RobbyS
Sad but true. It's their Amsterdam....wait...Amsterdam is their Amsterdam.
To: Conservative Infidel
I know your question is, perhaps, rhetorical...but it's because the teachers are mindless liberal zombies, thus not the sharpest tools in the shed. (Some are probably good, those not of the mindless zombie ilk, but too many are not.)
To: Semper Paratus
Its the bluest city in the country: Bush ran third behind the Green candidate. So, if there are fewer replacement lib Dems, isn't this "a good thing" as Martha Stewart would say?
23
posted on
05/25/2005 6:57:37 AM PDT
by
laconic
To: yooling
Yea, spend some more on "after school programs", that'll get the families with young kids just clamoring to get back in the city.
The depth of their ignorance as to the causes of families fleeing "the gay capital of the world" is stunning to behold.
24
posted on
05/25/2005 7:21:36 AM PDT
by
Jotmo
("Voon", said the mattress.)
To: Conservative Infidel
I hope you are not talking about PUBLIC schools.
Speaking of poor education in SF.
1.Bad super...
2.Liberals all over.
3.Not only SF but most of Bay area have poor quality schools.
25
posted on
05/25/2005 7:30:33 AM PDT
by
QQQQ
To: Conservative Infidel
I hope you are not talking about PUBLIC schools.
Speaking of poor education in SF.
1.Bad super...
2.Liberals all over.
3.Not only SF but most of Bay area have poor quality schools.
26
posted on
05/25/2005 7:31:23 AM PDT
by
QQQQ
To: yooling
This is liberal utopia - a city where an average family can't afford to live.
To: yooling
"Determined to change things, Mayor Gavin Newsom has put the kid crisis near the top of his agenda, appointing a 27-member policy council to develop plans for keeping families in the city."
NOTHING they can do will change the problem as long as a 1,000 square foot house costs $800,000 and the wealthy choose to have few or no children.
To: yooling
"it's about generations"
Yes, and a heavily gay population - which is what SF has courted for years - will not produce generations.
To: QQQQ
Even though the population of public students falls every year, I would be willing to bet that education funding continues to rise every year. It is the NEA conundrum--it costs more to do less with less.
30
posted on
05/25/2005 7:43:16 AM PDT
by
Conservative Infidel
(Only thing harder to find in US Senate these days than a Dem w/ a conscience is a Rep w/ a spine.)
To: yooling
Wow, this must be a serious crisis if a commie lib is willing to part with tax dollars to bring in more victims for gay recruitment
31
posted on
05/25/2005 7:50:43 AM PDT
by
Casekirchen
(If allah is just another name for the Judeo-Christian God, why do the islamics pray to a rock?)
To: in hoc signo vinces
The homosexual task force works hard in Boston to make sure they have access to the school children. Parents found them at a welcome table handing out literature to students at a public school. Information on health and the addresses of homosexual bars in Boston bothered some people. Watch the children and know who wants to teach them.
To: Mr. Jeeves
Guess all that gay sex is not producing many children?
33
posted on
05/25/2005 7:54:22 AM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
To: Mr. Jeeves
34
posted on
05/25/2005 7:57:10 AM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
To: Semper Paratus
My wife and I left the Bay Area nine years ago. We wanted to raise our children in a normal part of the country -- where gays and lesbians and other people on the edge weren't celebrated as normal. Lots of others moved for the same reason
Don't expect the media to interview folks like us.
35
posted on
05/25/2005 8:54:15 AM PDT
by
tom h
To: in hoc signo vinces
NO accident that Thailand is famous for sexual slavery. The notion is that you can't get aids from Virgins, the youngerthey are the most likely a virgin. That's only absolutely true if you use them one time and them thow them away,right?
36
posted on
05/25/2005 9:36:27 AM PDT
by
RobbyS
(W)
To: Mr. Jeeves
Not too suprising for gay town.
37
posted on
05/25/2005 10:55:30 AM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson