Posted on 10/02/2005 11:49:45 AM PDT by DoctorZIn
Top News Story
Questioning the Lack of Open Debate on Iran's Nuclear Program
Ahmad Zeidabadi
The government of the Islamic Republic of Iran insists on calling Iran’s nuclear issue the “national case”. I do not understand this insistence or why is the issue a ”national” one.
If those who call the issue a national one mean that its outcome will determine the destiny of the Iranian nation, which it will, what is the importance and value of this interpretation of the word “national” for its insistence? The fluctuation of the price of oil in international markets too affects the destiny of the Iranian nation so should that too be called “national?”
If the meaning of the word is that the goal of attaining the nuclear fuel cycle at any cost is a national goal of the whole Iranian population because it provides the national interest, then this is what I ask: How so? Did the Iranian nation have the possibility of openly and publicly debating the benefits and disadvantages of attaining the nuclear fuel cycle?
Unfortunately the authorities of the Islamic Republic have created such a closed atmosphere on the issue and react so strongly towards any criticism of the issue that no one dares to say anything publicly on the issue, let alone oppose the goal.
The possibility that, in an open and free atmosphere, the majority of Iranians may opt for the goal of acquiring the nuclear fuel cycle even at the expense of economic sanctions and military attack on the country’s infrastructure cannot be ruled out, but without such a discourse how can one talk of such a support?
The issue of course does not end here. Labeling the issue “national” raises responsibilities and bears consequences. There is a price for the relegation of the issue to the national level. The term assumes a belief in the supremacy of the nation-state in the contemporary age. Such a belief is based on the acceptance of equal rights for all the inhabitants or at least citizens of the land, regardless of their religious or political views. Do the authorities of the Islamic Republic of Iran believe in such a principle or see themselves bound by it?
Unfortunately not only do the authorities not see themselves committed to the principle of equal rights for all its citizens, they do not even believe in it and in fact expressly and formally reject it. One should note the response of the Iranian conservatists against the motto of Iranian reformers: “Iran for all Iranians”.
This motto is the most general and all-encompassing goal in accepting the principle of supremacy of the nation-state and equal rights for its citizens. The conservatists have declared this motto not only to be incompatible with their understanding of religion, but have even said it equals atheism. On what basis do those who do not want “Iran for all Iranians” and do not understand the principle, speak of the nuclear issue being “national”?
Is it even possible to divide the Iranian nation into different castes and accept special rights and privileges to those who believe in the principles of the authorities while denying those who criticize or oppose them politically their very basic rights and yet talk of a “nation” or “national” issue?
So if the Iranian government wishes to insist that the nuclear issue is a “national” one, it must first recognize the equal rights of people and only then use such terms. Otherwise, it only deforms the true meaning of such concepts.
DoctorZin:
The Iranian government wants the world to believe that Iranians are unified on the need for its nuclear program. In reality an open and free public discourse on the issue would likely show a divided nation on the issue. Many Iranians question the wisdom and the cost of the program domestically and internationally.
- Times of India reported that despite liberal anger at the government's support for sending Iran to the UN Security Council, the Indian government is sticking to its guns on the issue.
- Iranian blogger, Mehdrad Sheibani, Rooz Online discussed the recent discussion of a "change of views" in Iran and what to expect.
- Iranian blogger, Arash Motamed, Rooz Online discussed three options for the current crisis in Iran: war, talks with the US or a referendum.
- Iranian blogger, Farah Karimi, Rooz Online discussed Kofi Annan's proposal for creating a "Council of Human Rights" to overview human rights situations in different countries and provide it with sufficient and necessary executive authority to implement its decisions.
- Iranian blogger, Amil Imani, ThinkAndAsk.com interviewed a former Iranian student arrested for protesting the regime. The student provides insight into the methods used against dissidents in Iran.
- Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S. Department of State published Secretary Rice's recent speech at Princeton University.
- New York Post reported that investigators uncovered the secret funneling of millions of dollars from Iran and Saudi Arabia to groups like Hamas in the West Bank.
- Michael Rubin, Middle East Review of International Affairs argued that the pessimism regarding Iraq's future is unwarranted. A long but valuable read.
- Free2innovate.net warned that France pushed the European Union to propose a new Internet Governance plan which calls for a government-run body to control the Internet and hand over the future of the Internet to countries such as Iran, Syria and China.
- Khaleej Times Online reported that Iran would consider using oil as a weapon and denial of access to international nuclear inspectors if the United Nations Security Council is pressured by the US and allies to impose sanctions against it.
- European Voice reported Russian President Putin will be pressed next week to back Iran's referral to the United Nations' Security Council.
- National Post reported an Iranian prosecutor claimed that Canada had trained and supported bombers in southern Iran. Canadian officials denied the report.
- Iran Press News reported that the Islamic regime has falsified charges against detainees of recent clashes in Kurdistan.
- And finally, Iranian blogger, Korosh, The Price of Freedom reported Iranian dissident and blogger, Ahmad Seraj is in danger.
"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!
"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”
This is an important issue!
People can't talk about this in a dictatorship society and can't question the regime on its illegal activities!
People of Iran should understand they need to take care of their poor and addicts before having any thing like a nuke power plant.
To read today’s thread click here.
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!
"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.