Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gridlock
If this means 300 ft. of property has to be condemned on either side of the canal,I don't have a problem with that. That is legitimate public use.

Not if it displaces minorities, then it's overbearing racist government action.

9 posted on 10/04/2005 5:32:57 AM PDT by AbeKrieger (Islam is the virus that causes al-Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: AbeKrieger

You know what would be pretty slick? The reconstruction could build up the avenues parallel to the flood walls, so the first block is 10 ft above the flood line, with each subsequent block stepping down one or two feet, until you reach your base elevation. That way you would have a huge earthen dam with people living on top of it. You would have to restrict the land to surface use only, and have some controls in place to make sure nobody does anything foolish, like digging a swimming pool. But that way the land would not have to be lost.


13 posted on 10/04/2005 6:07:38 AM PDT by gridlock (You can be a hippie stoner peacenik, but the ROPers will still want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson