Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP is in 'deep funk' over Bush spending
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 3/12/6 | Carolyn Lochhead

Posted on 03/12/2006 7:51:39 AM PST by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-286 next last
To: SmithL

All well and good to talk about overspending, but how do these politicians defend their voting for all that overspending? It wasn't just Bush doing it. They all are guilty. And where were these voices while the money gushing was occurring? Just because of an election they come up with their criticism. How cynical.


61 posted on 03/12/2006 8:41:08 AM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

so they can say I told you so..

also there are a nubmer of completely delusional conservatives nad libertarians who think if only thinks get really really bad, then the sleeping american voter will wake up and vote for a true conservative...wont happen!!


62 posted on 03/12/2006 8:41:30 AM PST by georgia2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: georgia2006
"so many of their memebers are memebers for one reason and one reason only..legal narcotics"

No, that is just the element you focus on, I admit it exists, but is not the majority. I would hardly call the Cato Institute the rantings of a dope head.
63 posted on 03/12/2006 8:42:15 AM PST by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Congress controls the PURSE.....if the GOP did NOT like the Presidents budget all they had to do was CUT IT!!!

For 25 years all I hear is that the PRESIDENT is spending too much, well CONGRESS is at fault they CONTROL the PURSE!!!

Grow a set GOP!

64 posted on 03/12/2006 8:42:50 AM PST by PISANO (We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: ndt

you miss the point.

the point is that the LP is not and will not be taken seriously until they abandon their legalized drugs position.


66 posted on 03/12/2006 8:43:26 AM PST by georgia2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: KilljoyTX68

""Federally financed elections - citizen government, not corporate elections, that's what solves this problem.""

oh yes, the only free speech can be govt funded speech...wonderful!!!


67 posted on 03/12/2006 8:44:29 AM PST by georgia2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Note to moron columnists, rabid Freeper Bush haters, fringe party wack jobs and other bigoted Know Nothings

You are fighting a tough battle against a collapsing FR gene pool. It's the "things aren't going my way, therefore I'll mutilate myself" theory.

68 posted on 03/12/2006 8:44:45 AM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Sounds more like leftist wishful thinking to me. To be sure, we aren't thrilled with many of Bush's RINO policies but, to describe it as a "deep funk" is to push the limits of hyperbole.


69 posted on 03/12/2006 8:44:55 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KilljoyTX68

BTW no where in the constitution does it mention citizen government. we are not a direct democracy, we are a representative republic...


70 posted on 03/12/2006 8:45:36 AM PST by georgia2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

"YOU guys keep bashing the only hope that we have, and we are going to see floundering of Biblical Proportions"

If republicans would simply try to be conservative they'll win - that's really the only hope.

That the democrats will continue to be incompetent is a false hope, one that puts the onus on things that we, as republicans cannot control.

So if the democrats win in 06/08 and any items on your laundry list of doom occur, it won't be because of conservatives (who know the formula for sustained political success)

It's the folks who think conservatism can be successfully compromised (GWB foremost among them) for sustained political gain that will have lost.


71 posted on 03/12/2006 8:46:17 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper
I'd like to hear what this numbskull thinks that Bill Clinton did for the economy or to reduce spending.

The economy caught fire after the Republicans won the House and Senate in 1994. For 6 years, they wanted to cut spending and say no to the XXX-42's requests for spending. If they worked the same way in the last 5 years I would be happy. Instead, they caught Potomac Fever and took President Bush's requests for increases in spending and added even more. We need the 1994 Newt pit bulls back in Congress, not the 2006 neutered lap dogs.

72 posted on 03/12/2006 8:46:17 AM PST by KarlInOhio (The tree of liberty is getting awfully parched.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: PISANO

If congress sent a REAL SPENDING CUT bill to the President, he would sign it in a NY second. Congress is to blame far more than the Executive branch. Especially when they tie pork into bills that must pass for the Nation to survive.

LLS


73 posted on 03/12/2006 8:46:28 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Moving to stanch the damage, Bush called last week for Congress to grant him a line-item veto to prevent members from redirecting money in spending bills to their pet projects, a practice known as earmarking that has achieved notoriety under the GOP.

Six years too late!


Not to mention the huge waste of time and money. Why give Bush a line-item veto when he has yet to veto anything - line or otherwise??
74 posted on 03/12/2006 8:47:11 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ketelone

"Well, where could money be saved?"

How about shutting down the department of education? Maybe we could shut down HUD and auction off the property. How about the department of Mohair Studies? The Feds are really, really bloated.


75 posted on 03/12/2006 8:48:10 AM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Owen

http://zapatopi.net/afdb/build.html


76 posted on 03/12/2006 8:49:43 AM PST by Blackirish (What kind of name is Plame anyway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

Line Item veto was already struck down as unconstitutional back in 1995 I think.


77 posted on 03/12/2006 8:49:45 AM PST by georgia2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

"One small problem ... the Legislative branch spends, not the Executive"


Two bigger problems though:

1. Congress is majority-GOP.

2. Bush has yet to cast a single veto of anything, much less a veto of an increased-spending bill.


78 posted on 03/12/2006 8:51:24 AM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CowboyJay

"This is one I don't really lay at Bush's feet...

Think it's been as much Senatorial pork, as anything else."


But it's called a "veto" and Bush refuses to use this power.


79 posted on 03/12/2006 8:52:33 AM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Limited Edition of 2000!
Groundskeeper Willie's bust depicts the spitting mad MNjohnnie as you've never seen him before.
80 posted on 03/12/2006 8:53:03 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 281-286 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson